The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Gemini 3.5 Transcribe vs Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber

Comparing Gemini 3.5 Transcribe and Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber across benchmarks, pricing, and capabilities.

Google · Google · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Gemini 3.5 Transcribe and Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber trade strengths across price, capabilities, and technical limits. The better choice depends on the workload.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Gemini 3.5 Transcribe

  • you want predictable pricing at $2.00/M input and $12.00/M output

Choose Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber

  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Benchmark wins
Input price
$2.00 / M
— / M
Output price
$12.00 / M
— / M
Context window

Individual benchmarks

1 reported for Gemini 3.5 Transcribe · 4 for Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber

No common benchmarks found

Gemini 3.5 Transcribe and Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyberdon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Gemini 3.5 Transcribe supports multimodal inputs, whereas Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber does not.

Gemini 3.5 Transcribe can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Gemini 3.5 Transcribe

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.

Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.

Gemini 3.5 Transcribe

Proprietary

Closed source

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemini 3.5 Transcribe was released on 2026-08-26, while Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber was released on 2026-09-02.

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber is 0 month newer than Gemini 3.5 Transcribe.

Gemini 3.5 Transcribe

Aug 26, 2026

1 weeks ago

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber

Sep 2, 2026

3 days ago

1w newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Gemini 3.5 Transcribe and Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Gemini 3.5 Transcribe
✓ Preferred
Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Gemini 3.5 Transcribe vs Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber.

Which is better, Gemini 3.5 Transcribe or Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber?

Gemini 3.5 Transcribe (Google) and Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber (Google) each have strengths in different areas. Compare their benchmark scores, pricing, context windows, and capabilities above to determine which fits your needs.

How does Gemini 3.5 Transcribe compare to Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber in benchmarks?

Gemini 3.5 Transcribe scores FLEURS: 95.0%. Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber scores Gray Swan IPI Benchmark: 94.0%, CyberGym: 86.2%, Google Real-world Vulnerability Discovery: 71.0%, CWE-Bench: 47.2%.

What are the main differences between Gemini 3.5 Transcribe and Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber?

Key differences include multimodal support (yes vs no). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.