The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Gemini 3.5 Transcribe vs Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)

Comparing Gemini 3.5 Transcribe and Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) across benchmarks, pricing, and capabilities.

Google · NVIDIA · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Gemini 3.5 Transcribe and Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) trade strengths across price, capabilities, and technical limits. The better choice depends on the workload.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Gemini 3.5 Transcribe

  • you want predictable pricing at $2.00/M input and $12.00/M output

Choose Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)

  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Oct 2026
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Gemini 3.5 Transcribe
Google
Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)
NVIDIA
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
$2.00 / M
— / M
Output price
$12.00 / M
— / M
Context window
—
—

Individual benchmarks

1 reported for Gemini 3.5 Transcribe · 10 for Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)

No common benchmarks found

Gemini 3.5 Transcribe and Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)don't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Gemini 3.5 Transcribe supports multimodal inputs, whereas Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) does not.

Gemini 3.5 Transcribe can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Gemini 3.5 Transcribe

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Gemini 3.5 Transcribe is licensed under a proprietary license, while Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) uses OpenMDW License v1.1.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Gemini 3.5 Transcribe

Proprietary

Closed source

Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)

OpenMDW License v1.1

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemini 3.5 Transcribe was released on 2026-08-26, while Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) was released on 2026-10-16.

Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) is 2 months newer than Gemini 3.5 Transcribe.

Gemini 3.5 Transcribe

Aug 26, 2026

1 months ago

Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)

Oct 16, 2026

3 days ago

1mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Gemini 3.5 Transcribe and Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Gemini 3.5 Transcribe
✓ Preferred
Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Gemini 3.5 Transcribe vs Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B).

Which is better, Gemini 3.5 Transcribe or Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)?

Gemini 3.5 Transcribe (Google) and Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) (NVIDIA) each have strengths in different areas. Compare their benchmark scores, pricing, context windows, and capabilities above to determine which fits your needs.

How does Gemini 3.5 Transcribe compare to Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) in benchmarks?

Gemini 3.5 Transcribe scores FLEURS: 95.0%. Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) scores IFBench: 77.9%, GPQA: 72.4%, AA-LCR: 71.0%, SWE-Bench Verified: 59.5%, SciCode: 34.9%.

What are the main differences between Gemini 3.5 Transcribe and Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)?

Key differences include multimodal support (yes vs no), licensing (Proprietary vs OpenMDW License v1.1). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Gemini 3.5 Transcribe and Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)?

Gemini 3.5 Transcribe is developed by Google and Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) is developed by NVIDIA.

Related comparisons