The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Gemini 3.6 Flash vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash

Gemini 3.6 Flash and MiMo-V2.6-Flash are closely matched at 43.2 and 45.7 on the LLM Stats Score.

Google · Xiaomi · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Gemini 3.6 Flash and MiMo-V2.6-Flash are closely matched on the overall LLM Stats Score at 43.2 and 45.7.

In the 3 individual benchmarks reported for both models, MiMo-V2.6-Flash wins 2; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Gemini 3.6 Flash

  • you want predictable pricing at $1.50/M input and $7.50/M output

Choose MiMo-V2.6-Flash

  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 2 of 3 exact shared results
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Gemini 3.6 Flash
Google
MiMo-V2.6-Flash
Xiaomi
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
43.2
#42
45.7
#29
Reasoning
40.0
#55
43.2
#42
Coding
28.5
#60
36.6
#21
Agents
27.6
#44
33.3
#25
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
1 of 3
2 of 3
Input price
$1.50 / M
— / M
Output price
$7.50 / M
— / M
Context window
1,048,576
—

Individual benchmarks

7 reported for Gemini 3.6 Flash · 16 for MiMo-V2.6-Flash

3 shared

Gemini 3.6 Flash outperforms in 1 benchmarks (OSWorld-Verified), while MiMo-V2.6-Flash is better at 2 benchmarks (DeepSWE 1.1, Terminal-Bench 2.1).

MiMo-V2.6-Flash shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks.

Mon Sep 21 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Gemini 3.6 Flash specifies input context (1,048,576 tokens). Only Gemini 3.6 Flash specifies output context (65,536 tokens).

Google
Gemini 3.6 Flash
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output65,536 tokens
Xiaomi
MiMo-V2.6-Flash
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Mon Sep 21 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Both Gemini 3.6 Flash and MiMo-V2.6-Flash support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Gemini 3.6 Flash

Text
Images
Audio
Video

MiMo-V2.6-Flash

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Gemini 3.6 Flash is licensed under a proprietary license, while MiMo-V2.6-Flash uses MIT.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Gemini 3.6 Flash

Proprietary

Closed source

MiMo-V2.6-Flash

MIT

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemini 3.6 Flash was released on 2026-07-21, while MiMo-V2.6-Flash was released on 2026-09-22.

MiMo-V2.6-Flash is 2 months newer than Gemini 3.6 Flash.

Gemini 3.6 Flash

Jul 21, 2026

2 months ago

MiMo-V2.6-Flash

Sep 22, 2026

-1 days ago

2mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemini 3.6 Flash has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2026-03-31, while MiMo-V2.6-Flash's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Gemini 3.6 Flash's training data extends to 2026-03-31, but cannot make a direct comparison without MiMo-V2.6-Flash's cutoff date.

Gemini 3.6 Flash

Mar 2026

MiMo-V2.6-Flash

—

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Gemini 3.6 Flash and MiMo-V2.6-Flash side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Gemini 3.6 Flash
✓ Preferred
MiMo-V2.6-Flash
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Gemini 3.6 Flash vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash.

Which is better, Gemini 3.6 Flash or MiMo-V2.6-Flash?

Gemini 3.6 Flash and MiMo-V2.6-Flash are closely matched on the LLM Stats Score at 43.2 and 45.7. Gemini 3.6 Flash is made by Google and MiMo-V2.6-Flash is made by Xiaomi. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Gemini 3.6 Flash compare to MiMo-V2.6-Flash in benchmarks?

Gemini 3.6 Flash scores CharXiv-R: 89.4%, OSWorld-Verified: 83.0%, Terminal-Bench 2.1: 78.0%, MLE-Bench: 63.9%, SWE-Bench Pro: 58.7%. MiMo-V2.6-Flash scores CyberGym: 95.1%, Terminal-Bench 2.1: 87.6%, OSWorld-Verified: 80.8%, MiMo Cyber Bench: 77.2%, Toolathlon-Verified: 73.6%.

What are the context window sizes for Gemini 3.6 Flash and MiMo-V2.6-Flash?

Gemini 3.6 Flash supports 1.0M tokens and MiMo-V2.6-Flash supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Gemini 3.6 Flash and MiMo-V2.6-Flash?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (43.2 vs 45.7), licensing (Proprietary vs MIT). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Gemini 3.6 Flash and MiMo-V2.6-Flash?

Gemini 3.6 Flash is developed by Google and MiMo-V2.6-Flash is developed by Xiaomi.

Related comparisons