The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

MiMo-V2.6-Pro vs MiniMax M3.1 Flash

MiMo-V2.6-Pro and MiniMax M3.1 Flash are closely matched at 48.9 and 48.7 on the LLM Stats Score. MiniMax M3.1 Flash is 2.1x cheaper per token.

Xiaomi · MiniMax · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro and MiniMax M3.1 Flash are closely matched on the overall LLM Stats Score at 48.9 and 48.7.

In the 5 individual benchmarks reported for both models, MiniMax M3.1 Flash wins 3; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

On price, MiniMax M3.1 Flash is roughly 2.1x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

MiMo-V2.6-Pro also accepts a larger context window (1,048,576 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose MiMo-V2.6-Pro

  • you process long inputs — it offers a 1,048,576 token context window
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

Choose MiniMax M3.1 Flash

  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 3 of 5 exact shared results
  • cost matters — it's about 2.1x cheaper per token
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Oct 2026

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

MiMo-V2.6-Pro
Xiaomi
MiniMax M3.1 Flash
MiniMax
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
48.9
#27
48.7
#29
Reasoning
46.3
#31
45.9
#32
Coding
38.8
#18
37.9
#23
Agents
36.3
#20
35.7
#22
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
2 of 5
3 of 5
Input price
$0.43 / M
$0.15 / M
Output price
$0.87 / M
$0.60 / M
Context window
1,048,576
1,000,000

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared
Index
MiMo-V2.6-Pro
MiniMax M3.1 Flash
Tool use
29.7#14
27.1#27
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

18 reported for MiMo-V2.6-Pro · 15 for MiniMax M3.1 Flash

5 shared

MiMo-V2.6-Pro outperforms in 2 benchmarks (Agents' Last Exam, CyberGym), while MiniMax M3.1 Flash is better at 3 benchmarks (AutomationBench v1.0.6, DeepSWE 1.1, Terminal-Bench 4.0).

MiniMax M3.1 Flash has a slight edge in benchmark performance.

Fri Oct 23 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

MiniMax M3.1 Flash costs less

For input processing, MiMo-V2.6-Pro ($0.43/1M tokens) is 2.9x more expensive than MiniMax M3.1 Flash ($0.15/1M tokens).

For output processing, MiMo-V2.6-Pro ($0.87/1M tokens) is 1.4x more expensive than MiniMax M3.1 Flash ($0.60/1M tokens).

In conclusion, MiMo-V2.6-Pro is more expensive than MiniMax M3.1 Flash.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Fri Oct 23 2026 • llm-stats.com
Xiaomi
MiMo-V2.6-Pro
Input tokens$0.43
Output tokens$0.87
Best providerXiaomi
MiniMax
MiniMax M3.1 Flash
Input tokens$0.15
Output tokens$0.60
Best providerMiniMax
Notice missing or incorrect data?

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

MiMo-V2.6-Pro accepts 1,048,576 input tokens compared to MiniMax M3.1 Flash's 1,000,000 tokens. Only MiniMax M3.1 Flash specifies output context (524,288 tokens).

Xiaomi
MiMo-V2.6-Pro
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output- tokens
MiniMax
MiniMax M3.1 Flash
Input1,000,000 tokens
Output524,288 tokens
Fri Oct 23 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Both MiMo-V2.6-Pro and MiniMax M3.1 Flash support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

MiMo-V2.6-Pro

Text
Images
Audio
Video

MiniMax M3.1 Flash

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

MiMo-V2.6-Pro is licensed under MIT, while MiniMax M3.1 Flash uses a proprietary license.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

MiMo-V2.6-Pro

MIT

Open weights

MiniMax M3.1 Flash

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

MiMo-V2.6-Pro was released on 2026-09-22, while MiniMax M3.1 Flash was released on 2026-10-19.

MiniMax M3.1 Flash is 1 month newer than MiMo-V2.6-Pro.

MiMo-V2.6-Pro

Sep 22, 2026

4 weeks ago

MiniMax M3.1 Flash

Oct 19, 2026

1 days ago

3w newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

MiMo-V2.6-Pro is available from Xiaomi. MiniMax M3.1 Flash is available from MiniMax.

MiMo-V2.6-Pro

xiaomi logo
Xiaomi
Input Price:Input: $0.43/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.87/1M

MiniMax M3.1 Flash

minimax logo
MiniMax
Input Price:Input: $0.15/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.60/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against MiMo-V2.6-Pro and MiniMax M3.1 Flash side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

MiMo-V2.6-Pro
✓ Preferred
MiniMax M3.1 Flash
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about MiMo-V2.6-Pro vs MiniMax M3.1 Flash.

Which is better, MiMo-V2.6-Pro or MiniMax M3.1 Flash?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro and MiniMax M3.1 Flash are closely matched on the LLM Stats Score at 48.9 and 48.7. MiMo-V2.6-Pro is made by Xiaomi and MiniMax M3.1 Flash is made by MiniMax. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does MiMo-V2.6-Pro compare to MiniMax M3.1 Flash in benchmarks?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores CyberGym: 94.0%, Terminal-Bench 2.1: 89.9%, OSWorld-Verified: 82.0%, MiMo Cyber Bench: 81.7%, Toolathlon-Verified: 76.9%. MiniMax M3.1 Flash scores BabyVision: 91.0%, CharXiv-R: 82.5%, CyberGym: 82.2%, BankerToolBench: 76.2%, DeepSWE 1.1: 73.7%.

Is MiMo-V2.6-Pro cheaper than MiniMax M3.1 Flash?

MiniMax M3.1 Flash is 2.9x cheaper for input tokens. MiMo-V2.6-Pro costs $0.43/M input and $0.87/M output via xiaomi. MiniMax M3.1 Flash costs $0.15/M input and $0.60/M output via minimax.

What are the context window sizes for MiMo-V2.6-Pro and MiniMax M3.1 Flash?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro supports 1.0M tokens and MiniMax M3.1 Flash supports 1.0M tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between MiMo-V2.6-Pro and MiniMax M3.1 Flash?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (48.9 vs 48.7), context window (1.0M vs 1.0M), input pricing ($0.43 vs $0.15/M), licensing (MIT vs Proprietary). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes MiMo-V2.6-Pro and MiniMax M3.1 Flash?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro is developed by Xiaomi and MiniMax M3.1 Flash is developed by MiniMax.

Related comparisons