The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber vs IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber leads the LLM Stats Score 42.5 to -5.2.

Google · IBM · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber leads the overall LLM Stats Score 42.5 to -5.2, ranking #45 overall.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber

  • overall performance matters — it scores 42.5 and ranks #45 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes coding — it leads those capability indexes
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026

Choose IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview

  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber
Google
IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview
IBM
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
42.5
#45
-5.2
#345
Coding
35.6
#24
3.0
#211
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
— / M
— / M
Output price
— / M
— / M
Context window
—
—

Individual benchmarks

4 reported for Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber · 12 for IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview

No common benchmarks found

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber and IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Previewdon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

License

Usage and distribution terms

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber is licensed under a proprietary license, while IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber

Proprietary

Closed source

IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber was released on 2026-09-02, while IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview was released on 2025-05-02.

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber is 16 months newer than IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview.

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber

Sep 2, 2026

0 days ago

1.3yr newer
IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview

May 2, 2025

1.3 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber and IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber
✓ Preferred
IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber vs IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview.

Which is better, Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber or IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview?

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber leads the LLM Stats Score 42.5 to -5.2. Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber is made by Google and IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview is made by IBM. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber compare to IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview in benchmarks?

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber scores Gray Swan IPI Benchmark: 94.0%, CyberGym: 86.2%, Google Real-world Vulnerability Discovery: 71.0%, CWE-Bench: 47.2%. IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview scores AttaQ: 86.1%, HumanEval: 82.4%, HumanEval+: 78.3%, GSM8k: 70.1%, IFEval: 63.0%.

What are the main differences between Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber and IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (42.5 vs -5.2), licensing (Proprietary vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber and IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview?

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber is developed by Google and IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview is developed by IBM.

Related comparisons