The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber vs Grok-2 Image 1212

Comparing Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber and Grok-2 Image 1212 across benchmarks, pricing, and capabilities.

Google · xAI · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber and Grok-2 Image 1212 trade strengths across price, capabilities, and technical limits. The better choice depends on the workload.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber

  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026

Choose Grok-2 Image 1212

  • you are already invested in the xAI ecosystem

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber
Google
Grok-2 Image 1212
xAI
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
— / M
— / M
Output price
— / M
— / M
Context window
—
131,072

Individual benchmarks

4 reported for Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber · 0 for Grok-2 Image 1212

No common benchmarks found

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber and Grok-2 Image 1212don't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Grok-2 Image 1212 specifies input context (131,072 tokens).

Google
Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
xAI
Grok-2 Image 1212
Input131,072 tokens
Output- tokens
Sun Sep 20 2026 • llm-stats.com

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.

Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber

Proprietary

Closed source

Grok-2 Image 1212

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber was released on 2026-09-02, while Grok-2 Image 1212 was released on 2024-12-12.

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber is 21 months newer than Grok-2 Image 1212.

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber

Sep 2, 2026

2 weeks ago

1.7yr newer
Grok-2 Image 1212

Dec 12, 2024

1.8 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber and Grok-2 Image 1212 side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber
✓ Preferred
Grok-2 Image 1212
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber vs Grok-2 Image 1212.

Which is better, Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber or Grok-2 Image 1212?

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber (Google) and Grok-2 Image 1212 (xAI) each have strengths in different areas. Compare their benchmark scores, pricing, context windows, and capabilities above to determine which fits your needs.

How does Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber compare to Grok-2 Image 1212 in benchmarks?

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber scores Gray Swan IPI Benchmark: 94.0%, CyberGym: 86.2%, Google Real-world Vulnerability Discovery: 71.0%, CWE-Bench: 47.2%.

What are the context window sizes for Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber and Grok-2 Image 1212?

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber supports an unknown number of tokens and Grok-2 Image 1212 supports 131K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

Who makes Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber and Grok-2 Image 1212?

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber is developed by Google and Grok-2 Image 1212 is developed by xAI.

Related comparisons