The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Grok-2 Image 1212 vs Ling 3.0 Flash Fin

Comparing Grok-2 Image 1212 and Ling 3.0 Flash Fin across benchmarks, pricing, and capabilities.

xAI · InclusionAI · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Grok-2 Image 1212 and Ling 3.0 Flash Fin trade strengths across price, capabilities, and technical limits. The better choice depends on the workload.

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin also accepts a larger context window (262,144 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Grok-2 Image 1212

  • you are already invested in the xAI ecosystem

Choose Ling 3.0 Flash Fin

  • you process long inputs — it offers a 262,144 token context window
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Grok-2 Image 1212
xAI
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin
InclusionAI
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
— / M
$0.06 / M
Output price
— / M
$0.18 / M
Context window
131,072
262,144

Individual benchmarks

0 reported for Grok-2 Image 1212 · 6 for Ling 3.0 Flash Fin

No common benchmarks found

Grok-2 Image 1212 and Ling 3.0 Flash Findon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin accepts 262,144 input tokens compared to Grok-2 Image 1212's 131,072 tokens. Only Ling 3.0 Flash Fin specifies output context (262,144 tokens).

xAI
Grok-2 Image 1212
Input131,072 tokens
Output- tokens
InclusionAI
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin
Input262,144 tokens
Output262,144 tokens
Sun Sep 20 2026 • llm-stats.com

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Grok-2 Image 1212 was released on 2024-12-12, while Ling 3.0 Flash Fin was released on 2026-09-03.

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin is 21 months newer than Grok-2 Image 1212.

Grok-2 Image 1212

Dec 12, 2024

1.8 years ago

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin

Sep 3, 2026

2 weeks ago

1.7yr newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

Grok-2 Image 1212 is available from xAI. Ling 3.0 Flash Fin is available from DeepInfra.

Grok-2 Image 1212

xai logo
xAI

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin

deepinfra logo
Deepinfra
Input Price:Input: $0.06/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.18/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Grok-2 Image 1212 and Ling 3.0 Flash Fin side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Grok-2 Image 1212
✓ Preferred
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Grok-2 Image 1212 vs Ling 3.0 Flash Fin.

Which is better, Grok-2 Image 1212 or Ling 3.0 Flash Fin?

Grok-2 Image 1212 (xAI) and Ling 3.0 Flash Fin (InclusionAI) each have strengths in different areas. Compare their benchmark scores, pricing, context windows, and capabilities above to determine which fits your needs.

How does Grok-2 Image 1212 compare to Ling 3.0 Flash Fin in benchmarks?

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin scores SpreadSheetBench-v1: 86.5%, Finance Agent v1.1: 69.2%, Finance Agent v2: 59.8%, Tau3 Banking: 41.0%, APEX-Agents: 29.2%.

What are the context window sizes for Grok-2 Image 1212 and Ling 3.0 Flash Fin?

Grok-2 Image 1212 supports 131K tokens and Ling 3.0 Flash Fin supports 262K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Grok-2 Image 1212 and Ling 3.0 Flash Fin?

Key differences include context window (131K vs 262K), licensing (Proprietary vs Unknown). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Grok-2 Image 1212 and Ling 3.0 Flash Fin?

Grok-2 Image 1212 is developed by xAI and Ling 3.0 Flash Fin is developed by InclusionAI.

Related comparisons