The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber vs Hy3

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber and Hy3 are closely matched at 42.3 and 43.2 on the LLM Stats Score.

Google · Tencent · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber and Hy3 are closely matched on the overall LLM Stats Score at 42.3 and 43.2.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber

  • your work emphasizes agents — it leads those capability indexes
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026

Choose Hy3

  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber
Google
Hy3
Tencent
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
42.3
#46
43.2
#40
Coding
35.7
#25
33.5
#33
Agents
31.5
#28
27.4
#42
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
— / M
$0.14 / M
Output price
— / M
$0.58 / M
Context window
—
262,144

Individual benchmarks

4 reported for Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber · 31 for Hy3

No common benchmarks found

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber and Hy3don't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Hy3 specifies input context (262,144 tokens). Only Hy3 specifies output context (262,144 tokens).

Google
Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Tencent
Hy3
Input262,144 tokens
Output262,144 tokens
Thu Sep 10 2026 • llm-stats.com

License

Usage and distribution terms

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber is licensed under a proprietary license, while Hy3 uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber

Proprietary

Closed source

Hy3

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber was released on 2026-09-02, while Hy3 was released on 2026-07-06.

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber is 2 months newer than Hy3.

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber

Sep 2, 2026

1 weeks ago

1mo newer
Hy3

Jul 6, 2026

2 months ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber and Hy3 side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber
✓ Preferred
Hy3
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber vs Hy3.

Which is better, Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber or Hy3?

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber and Hy3 are closely matched on the LLM Stats Score at 42.3 and 43.2. Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber is made by Google and Hy3 is made by Tencent. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber compare to Hy3 in benchmarks?

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber scores Gray Swan IPI Benchmark: 94.0%, CyberGym: 86.2%, Google Real-world Vulnerability Discovery: 71.0%, CWE-Bench: 47.2%. Hy3 scores DeepSearchQA: 91.0%, GPQA: 90.4%, IMO-AnswerBench: 90.0%, BrowseComp: 84.2%, MCP Atlas: 79.1%.

What are the context window sizes for Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber and Hy3?

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber supports an unknown number of tokens and Hy3 supports 262K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber and Hy3?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (42.3 vs 43.2), licensing (Proprietary vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber and Hy3?

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber is developed by Google and Hy3 is developed by Tencent.

Related comparisons