The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber vs Llama 4 Scout

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber leads the LLM Stats Score 42.7 to 8.1.

Google · Meta · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber leads the overall LLM Stats Score 42.7 to 8.1, ranking #44 overall.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber

  • overall performance matters — it scores 42.7 and ranks #44 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes coding — it leads those capability indexes
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026

Choose Llama 4 Scout

  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber
Google
Llama 4 Scout
Meta
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
42.7
#44
8.1
#269
Coding
36.1
#25
0.5
#229
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
— / M
$0.08 / M
Output price
— / M
$0.30 / M
Context window
—
10,000,000

Individual benchmarks

4 reported for Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber · 12 for Llama 4 Scout

No common benchmarks found

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber and Llama 4 Scoutdon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Llama 4 Scout specifies input context (10,000,000 tokens). Only Llama 4 Scout specifies output context (10,000,000 tokens).

Google
Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Meta
Llama 4 Scout
Input10,000,000 tokens
Output10,000,000 tokens
Wed Sep 02 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Llama 4 Scout supports multimodal inputs, whereas Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber does not.

Llama 4 Scout can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Llama 4 Scout

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber is licensed under a proprietary license, while Llama 4 Scout uses Llama 4 Community License Agreement.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber

Proprietary

Closed source

Llama 4 Scout

Llama 4 Community License Agreement

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber was released on 2026-09-02, while Llama 4 Scout was released on 2025-04-05.

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber is 17 months newer than Llama 4 Scout.

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber

Sep 2, 2026

0 days ago

1.4yr newer
Llama 4 Scout

Apr 5, 2025

1.4 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber and Llama 4 Scout side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber
✓ Preferred
Llama 4 Scout
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber vs Llama 4 Scout.

Which is better, Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber or Llama 4 Scout?

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber leads the LLM Stats Score 42.7 to 8.1. Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber is made by Google and Llama 4 Scout is made by Meta. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber compare to Llama 4 Scout in benchmarks?

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber scores Gray Swan IPI Benchmark: 94.0%, CyberGym: 86.2%, Google Real-world Vulnerability Discovery: 71.0%, CWE-Bench: 47.2%. Llama 4 Scout scores DocVQA: 94.4%, MGSM: 90.6%, ChartQA: 88.8%, MMLU: 79.6%, MMLU-Pro: 74.3%.

What are the context window sizes for Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber and Llama 4 Scout?

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber supports an unknown number of tokens and Llama 4 Scout supports 10.0M tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber and Llama 4 Scout?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (42.7 vs 8.1), multimodal support (no vs yes), licensing (Proprietary vs Llama 4 Community License Agreement). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber and Llama 4 Scout?

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber is developed by Google and Llama 4 Scout is developed by Meta.

Related comparisons