The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B)

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber leads the LLM Stats Score 39.2 to 35.0.

Google · NVIDIA · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber leads the overall LLM Stats Score 39.2 to 35.0, ranking #74 overall.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber

  • overall performance matters — it scores 39.2 and ranks #74 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes coding and agents — it leads those capability indexes

Choose Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B)

  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Oct 2026
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber
Google
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B)
NVIDIA
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
39.2
#74
35.0
#108
Coding
31.7
#52
21.0
#108
Agents
28.5
#54
16.5
#99
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
— / M
$0.20 / M
Output price
— / M
$1.00 / M
Context window
—
262,144

Individual benchmarks

4 reported for Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber · 19 for Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B)

No common benchmarks found

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B)don't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) specifies input context (262,144 tokens). Only Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) specifies output context (262,144 tokens).

Google
Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
NVIDIA
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B)
Input262,144 tokens
Output262,144 tokens
Tue Oct 20 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) supports multimodal inputs, whereas Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber does not.

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B)

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber is licensed under a proprietary license, while Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) uses OpenMDW License v1.1.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber

Proprietary

Closed source

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B)

OpenMDW License v1.1

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber was released on 2026-09-02, while Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) was released on 2026-10-15.

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) is 1 month newer than Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber.

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber

Sep 2, 2026

1 months ago

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B)

Oct 15, 2026

5 days ago

1mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber
✓ Preferred
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B)
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B).

Which is better, Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber or Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B)?

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber leads the LLM Stats Score 39.2 to 35.0. Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber is made by Google and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) is made by NVIDIA. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber compare to Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) in benchmarks?

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber scores Gray Swan IPI Benchmark: 94.0%, CyberGym: 86.2%, Google Real-world Vulnerability Discovery: 71.0%, CWE-Bench: 47.2%. Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) scores GPQA: 89.5%, LiveCodeBench v6: 88.2%, CharXiv-R: 80.8%, MathVision: 78.2%, BrowseComp: 78.0%.

What are the context window sizes for Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B)?

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber supports an unknown number of tokens and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) supports 262K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B)?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (39.2 vs 35.0), multimodal support (no vs yes), licensing (Proprietary vs OpenMDW License v1.1). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B)?

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber is developed by Google and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) is developed by NVIDIA.

Related comparisons