The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber vs Muse Glimmer-30B

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber leads the LLM Stats Score 40.3 to 35.0.

Google · Meta · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber leads the overall LLM Stats Score 40.3 to 35.0, ranking #55 overall.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber

  • overall performance matters — it scores 40.3 and ranks #55 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes coding and agents — it leads those capability indexes
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026

Choose Muse Glimmer-30B

  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber
Google
Muse Glimmer-30B
Meta
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
40.3
#55
35.0
#90
Coding
33.1
#36
22.3
#81
Agents
29.8
#35
16.6
#78
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
— / M
$0.30 / M
Output price
— / M
$1.20 / M
Context window
—
131,072

Individual benchmarks

4 reported for Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber · 25 for Muse Glimmer-30B

No common benchmarks found

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber and Muse Glimmer-30Bdon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Muse Glimmer-30B specifies input context (131,072 tokens). Only Muse Glimmer-30B specifies output context (131,072 tokens).

Google
Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Meta
Muse Glimmer-30B
Input131,072 tokens
Output131,072 tokens
Sun Sep 20 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Muse Glimmer-30B supports multimodal inputs, whereas Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber does not.

Muse Glimmer-30B can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Muse Glimmer-30B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber is licensed under a proprietary license, while Muse Glimmer-30B uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber

Proprietary

Closed source

Muse Glimmer-30B

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber was released on 2026-09-02, while Muse Glimmer-30B was released on 2026-08-10.

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber is 1 month newer than Muse Glimmer-30B.

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber

Sep 2, 2026

2 weeks ago

3w newer
Muse Glimmer-30B

Aug 10, 2026

1 months ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Muse Glimmer-30B has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2026-01-04, while Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Muse Glimmer-30B's training data extends to 2026-01-04, but cannot make a direct comparison without Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber's cutoff date.

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber

—

Muse Glimmer-30B

Jan 2026

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber and Muse Glimmer-30B side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber
✓ Preferred
Muse Glimmer-30B
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber vs Muse Glimmer-30B.

Which is better, Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber or Muse Glimmer-30B?

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber leads the LLM Stats Score 40.3 to 35.0. Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber is made by Google and Muse Glimmer-30B is made by Meta. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber compare to Muse Glimmer-30B in benchmarks?

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber scores Gray Swan IPI Benchmark: 94.0%, CyberGym: 86.2%, Google Real-world Vulnerability Discovery: 71.0%, CWE-Bench: 47.2%. Muse Glimmer-30B scores AIME 2026: 94.7%, Siren AgentDojo Utility: 94.2%, GPQA: 83.5%, AA-LCR: 80.0%, CharXiv-R: 78.8%.

What are the context window sizes for Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber and Muse Glimmer-30B?

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber supports an unknown number of tokens and Muse Glimmer-30B supports 131K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber and Muse Glimmer-30B?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (40.3 vs 35.0), multimodal support (no vs yes), licensing (Proprietary vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber and Muse Glimmer-30B?

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber is developed by Google and Muse Glimmer-30B is developed by Meta.

Related comparisons