The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Kimi K2.8 Preview vs Muse Glimmer-30B

Comparing Kimi K2.8 Preview and Muse Glimmer-30B across benchmarks, pricing, and capabilities.

Moonshot AI · Meta · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Kimi K2.8 Preview and Muse Glimmer-30B trade strengths across price, capabilities, and technical limits. The better choice depends on the workload.

Kimi K2.8 Preview also accepts a larger context window (1,048,576 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Kimi K2.8 Preview

  • you process long inputs — it offers a 1,048,576 token context window
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026

Choose Muse Glimmer-30B

  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Benchmark wins
Input price
— / M
$0.30 / M
Output price
— / M
$1.20 / M
Context window
1,048,576
131,072

Individual benchmarks

0 reported for Kimi K2.8 Preview · 25 for Muse Glimmer-30B

No common benchmarks found

Kimi K2.8 Preview and Muse Glimmer-30Bdon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Kimi K2.8 Preview accepts 1,048,576 input tokens compared to Muse Glimmer-30B's 131,072 tokens. Only Muse Glimmer-30B specifies output context (131,072 tokens).

Moonshot AI
Kimi K2.8 Preview
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output- tokens
Meta
Muse Glimmer-30B
Input131,072 tokens
Output131,072 tokens
Sun Sep 20 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Both Kimi K2.8 Preview and Muse Glimmer-30B support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Kimi K2.8 Preview

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Muse Glimmer-30B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Kimi K2.8 Preview is licensed under a proprietary license, while Muse Glimmer-30B uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Kimi K2.8 Preview

Proprietary

Closed source

Muse Glimmer-30B

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Kimi K2.8 Preview was released on 2026-09-11, while Muse Glimmer-30B was released on 2026-08-10.

Kimi K2.8 Preview is 1 month newer than Muse Glimmer-30B.

Kimi K2.8 Preview

Sep 11, 2026

1 weeks ago

1mo newer
Muse Glimmer-30B

Aug 10, 2026

1 months ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Muse Glimmer-30B has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2026-01-04, while Kimi K2.8 Preview's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Muse Glimmer-30B's training data extends to 2026-01-04, but cannot make a direct comparison without Kimi K2.8 Preview's cutoff date.

Kimi K2.8 Preview

Muse Glimmer-30B

Jan 2026

Provider Availability

Kimi K2.8 Preview is available from Moonshot AI. Muse Glimmer-30B is available from DeepInfra.

Kimi K2.8 Preview

moonshot logo
Unknown Organization

Muse Glimmer-30B

deepinfra logo
Deepinfra
Input Price:Input: $0.30/1MOutput Price:Output: $1.20/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Kimi K2.8 Preview and Muse Glimmer-30B side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Kimi K2.8 Preview
✓ Preferred
Muse Glimmer-30B
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Kimi K2.8 Preview vs Muse Glimmer-30B.

Which is better, Kimi K2.8 Preview or Muse Glimmer-30B?

Kimi K2.8 Preview (Moonshot AI) and Muse Glimmer-30B (Meta) each have strengths in different areas. Compare their benchmark scores, pricing, context windows, and capabilities above to determine which fits your needs.

How does Kimi K2.8 Preview compare to Muse Glimmer-30B in benchmarks?

Muse Glimmer-30B scores AIME 2026: 94.7%, Siren AgentDojo Utility: 94.2%, GPQA: 83.5%, AA-LCR: 80.0%, CharXiv-R: 78.8%.

What are the context window sizes for Kimi K2.8 Preview and Muse Glimmer-30B?

Kimi K2.8 Preview supports 1.0M tokens and Muse Glimmer-30B supports 131K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Kimi K2.8 Preview and Muse Glimmer-30B?

Key differences include context window (1.0M vs 131K), licensing (Proprietary vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Kimi K2.8 Preview and Muse Glimmer-30B?

Kimi K2.8 Preview is developed by Moonshot AI and Muse Glimmer-30B is developed by Meta.