The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber vs Qwen3.8 Flash

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber and Qwen3.8 Flash are closely matched at 42.7 and 49.5 on the LLM Stats Score.

Google · Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber and Qwen3.8 Flash are closely matched on the overall LLM Stats Score at 42.7 and 49.5.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber

  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026

Choose Qwen3.8 Flash

  • you want predictable pricing at $0.15/M input and $0.47/M output

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber
Google
Qwen3.8 Flash
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
42.7
#44
49.5
#18
Coding
36.1
#25
36.5
#21
Agents
31.7
#25
35.3
#17
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
— / M
$0.15 / M
Output price
— / M
$0.47 / M
Context window
—
1,000,000

Individual benchmarks

4 reported for Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber · 22 for Qwen3.8 Flash

No common benchmarks found

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber and Qwen3.8 Flashdon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Qwen3.8 Flash specifies input context (1,000,000 tokens). Only Qwen3.8 Flash specifies output context (131,072 tokens).

Google
Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3.8 Flash
Input1,000,000 tokens
Output131,072 tokens
Wed Sep 02 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Qwen3.8 Flash supports multimodal inputs, whereas Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber does not.

Qwen3.8 Flash can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Qwen3.8 Flash

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.

Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber

Proprietary

Closed source

Qwen3.8 Flash

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber was released on 2026-09-02, while Qwen3.8 Flash was released on 2026-08-26.

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber is 0 month newer than Qwen3.8 Flash.

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber

Sep 2, 2026

0 days ago

1w newer
Qwen3.8 Flash

Aug 26, 2026

1 weeks ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber and Qwen3.8 Flash side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber
✓ Preferred
Qwen3.8 Flash
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber vs Qwen3.8 Flash.

Which is better, Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber or Qwen3.8 Flash?

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber and Qwen3.8 Flash are closely matched on the LLM Stats Score at 42.7 and 49.5. Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber is made by Google and Qwen3.8 Flash is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber compare to Qwen3.8 Flash in benchmarks?

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber scores Gray Swan IPI Benchmark: 94.0%, CyberGym: 86.2%, Google Real-world Vulnerability Discovery: 71.0%, CWE-Bench: 47.2%. Qwen3.8 Flash scores MathVision: 95.7%, LiveCodeBench v6: 91.9%, GPQA: 91.7%, CharXiv-R: 90.6%, RealWorldQA: 88.5%.

What are the context window sizes for Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber and Qwen3.8 Flash?

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber supports an unknown number of tokens and Qwen3.8 Flash supports 1.0M tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber and Qwen3.8 Flash?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (42.7 vs 49.5), multimodal support (no vs yes). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber and Qwen3.8 Flash?

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber is developed by Google and Qwen3.8 Flash is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.

Related comparisons