The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber and Qwen3.8-Flash-Next are closely matched at 42.7 and 49.5 on the LLM Stats Score.

Google · Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber and Qwen3.8-Flash-Next are closely matched on the overall LLM Stats Score at 42.7 and 49.5.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber

  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026

Choose Qwen3.8-Flash-Next

  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
42.7
#44
49.5
#17
36.1
#25
36.5
#20
31.7
#25
35.4
#16
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
Input price
— / M
— / M
Output price
— / M
— / M
Context window

Individual benchmarks

4 reported for Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber · 22 for Qwen3.8-Flash-Next

No common benchmarks found

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber and Qwen3.8-Flash-Nextdon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Qwen3.8-Flash-Next supports multimodal inputs, whereas Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber does not.

Qwen3.8-Flash-Next can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Qwen3.8-Flash-Next

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber is licensed under a proprietary license, while Qwen3.8-Flash-Next uses Qwen Community License 1.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber

Proprietary

Closed source

Qwen3.8-Flash-Next

Qwen Community License 1.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber was released on 2026-09-02, while Qwen3.8-Flash-Next was released on 2026-08-26.

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber is 0 month newer than Qwen3.8-Flash-Next.

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber

Sep 2, 2026

0 days ago

1w newer
Qwen3.8-Flash-Next

Aug 26, 2026

1 weeks ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber and Qwen3.8-Flash-Next side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber
✓ Preferred
Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next.

Which is better, Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber or Qwen3.8-Flash-Next?

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber and Qwen3.8-Flash-Next are closely matched on the LLM Stats Score at 42.7 and 49.5. Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber is made by Google and Qwen3.8-Flash-Next is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber compare to Qwen3.8-Flash-Next in benchmarks?

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber scores Gray Swan IPI Benchmark: 94.0%, CyberGym: 86.2%, Google Real-world Vulnerability Discovery: 71.0%, CWE-Bench: 47.2%. Qwen3.8-Flash-Next scores MathVision: 95.7%, LiveCodeBench v6: 91.9%, GPQA: 91.7%, CharXiv-R: 90.6%, RealWorldQA: 88.5%.

What are the main differences between Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber and Qwen3.8-Flash-Next?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (42.7 vs 49.5), multimodal support (no vs yes), licensing (Proprietary vs Qwen Community License 1.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber and Qwen3.8-Flash-Next?

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber is developed by Google and Qwen3.8-Flash-Next is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.