The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber vs QwQ-32B-Preview

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber leads the LLM Stats Score 42.5 to 9.3.

Google · Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber leads the overall LLM Stats Score 42.5 to 9.3, ranking #45 overall.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber

  • overall performance matters — it scores 42.5 and ranks #45 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes coding — it leads those capability indexes
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026

Choose QwQ-32B-Preview

  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber
Google
QwQ-32B-Preview
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
42.5
#45
9.3
#258
Coding
35.6
#24
4.6
#199
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
— / M
$0.15 / M
Output price
— / M
$0.20 / M
Context window
—
32,768

Individual benchmarks

4 reported for Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber · 4 for QwQ-32B-Preview

No common benchmarks found

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber and QwQ-32B-Previewdon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only QwQ-32B-Preview specifies input context (32,768 tokens). Only QwQ-32B-Preview specifies output context (32,768 tokens).

Google
Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
QwQ-32B-Preview
Input32,768 tokens
Output32,768 tokens
Thu Sep 03 2026 • llm-stats.com

License

Usage and distribution terms

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber is licensed under a proprietary license, while QwQ-32B-Preview uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber

Proprietary

Closed source

QwQ-32B-Preview

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber was released on 2026-09-02, while QwQ-32B-Preview was released on 2024-11-28.

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber is 21 months newer than QwQ-32B-Preview.

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber

Sep 2, 2026

0 days ago

1.8yr newer
QwQ-32B-Preview

Nov 28, 2024

1.8 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

QwQ-32B-Preview has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2024-11-28, while Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm QwQ-32B-Preview's training data extends to 2024-11-28, but cannot make a direct comparison without Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber's cutoff date.

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber

—

QwQ-32B-Preview

Nov 2024

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber and QwQ-32B-Preview side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber
✓ Preferred
QwQ-32B-Preview
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber vs QwQ-32B-Preview.

Which is better, Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber or QwQ-32B-Preview?

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber leads the LLM Stats Score 42.5 to 9.3. Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber is made by Google and QwQ-32B-Preview is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber compare to QwQ-32B-Preview in benchmarks?

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber scores Gray Swan IPI Benchmark: 94.0%, CyberGym: 86.2%, Google Real-world Vulnerability Discovery: 71.0%, CWE-Bench: 47.2%. QwQ-32B-Preview scores MATH-500: 90.6%, GPQA: 65.2%, AIME 2024: 50.0%, LiveCodeBench: 50.0%.

What are the context window sizes for Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber and QwQ-32B-Preview?

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber supports an unknown number of tokens and QwQ-32B-Preview supports 33K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber and QwQ-32B-Preview?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (42.5 vs 9.3), licensing (Proprietary vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber and QwQ-32B-Preview?

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber is developed by Google and QwQ-32B-Preview is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.

Related comparisons