The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber vs Seed 2.0 Lite

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber leads the LLM Stats Score 40.3 to 31.9.

Google · ByteDance · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber leads the overall LLM Stats Score 40.3 to 31.9, ranking #55 overall.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber

  • overall performance matters — it scores 40.3 and ranks #55 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes coding — it leads those capability indexes
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026

Choose Seed 2.0 Lite

  • you are already invested in the ByteDance ecosystem

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber
Google
Seed 2.0 Lite
ByteDance
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
40.3
#55
31.9
#108
Coding
33.1
#36
17.9
#114
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
— / M
— / M
Output price
— / M
— / M
Context window
—
—

Individual benchmarks

4 reported for Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber · 5 for Seed 2.0 Lite

No common benchmarks found

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber and Seed 2.0 Litedon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Seed 2.0 Lite supports multimodal inputs, whereas Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber does not.

Seed 2.0 Lite can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Seed 2.0 Lite

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.

Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber

Proprietary

Closed source

Seed 2.0 Lite

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber was released on 2026-09-02, while Seed 2.0 Lite was released on 2026-02-14.

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber is 7 months newer than Seed 2.0 Lite.

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber

Sep 2, 2026

2 weeks ago

6mo newer
Seed 2.0 Lite

Feb 14, 2026

7 months ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Seed 2.0 Lite has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2024-01-01, while Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Seed 2.0 Lite's training data extends to 2024-01-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber's cutoff date.

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber

—

Seed 2.0 Lite

Jan 2024

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber and Seed 2.0 Lite side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber
✓ Preferred
Seed 2.0 Lite
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber vs Seed 2.0 Lite.

Which is better, Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber or Seed 2.0 Lite?

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber leads the LLM Stats Score 40.3 to 31.9. Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber is made by Google and Seed 2.0 Lite is made by ByteDance. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber compare to Seed 2.0 Lite in benchmarks?

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber scores Gray Swan IPI Benchmark: 94.0%, CyberGym: 86.2%, Google Real-world Vulnerability Discovery: 71.0%, CWE-Bench: 47.2%. Seed 2.0 Lite scores AIME 2025: 93.0%, AIME 2026: 88.3%, GPQA: 85.1%, LiveCodeBench v6: 81.7%, SWE-Bench Verified: 73.5%.

What are the main differences between Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber and Seed 2.0 Lite?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (40.3 vs 31.9), multimodal support (no vs yes). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber and Seed 2.0 Lite?

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber is developed by Google and Seed 2.0 Lite is developed by ByteDance.

Related comparisons