The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Gemini 3.8 Flash vs Seed 2.0 Lite

Gemini 3.8 Flash leads the LLM Stats Score 50.5 to 31.9.

Google · ByteDance · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Gemini 3.8 Flash leads the overall LLM Stats Score 50.5 to 31.9, ranking #17 overall.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Gemini 3.8 Flash

  • overall performance matters — it scores 50.5 and ranks #17 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026

Choose Seed 2.0 Lite

  • you are already invested in the ByteDance ecosystem

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Gemini 3.8 Flash
Google
Seed 2.0 Lite
ByteDance
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
50.5
#17
31.9
#108
Reasoning
46.9
#25
31.5
#107
Coding
38.6
#15
17.9
#114
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
$0.75 / M
— / M
Output price
$3.75 / M
— / M
Context window
1,048,576
—

Individual benchmarks

13 reported for Gemini 3.8 Flash · 5 for Seed 2.0 Lite

No common benchmarks found

Gemini 3.8 Flash and Seed 2.0 Litedon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Gemini 3.8 Flash specifies input context (1,048,576 tokens). Only Gemini 3.8 Flash specifies output context (65,536 tokens).

Google
Gemini 3.8 Flash
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output65,536 tokens
ByteDance
Seed 2.0 Lite
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Mon Sep 21 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Both Gemini 3.8 Flash and Seed 2.0 Lite support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Gemini 3.8 Flash

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Seed 2.0 Lite

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.

Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.

Gemini 3.8 Flash

Proprietary

Closed source

Seed 2.0 Lite

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemini 3.8 Flash was released on 2026-09-02, while Seed 2.0 Lite was released on 2026-02-14.

Gemini 3.8 Flash is 7 months newer than Seed 2.0 Lite.

Gemini 3.8 Flash

Sep 2, 2026

2 weeks ago

6mo newer
Seed 2.0 Lite

Feb 14, 2026

7 months ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemini 3.8 Flash has a knowledge cutoff of 2026-03-31, while Seed 2.0 Lite has a cutoff of 2024-01-01.

Gemini 3.8 Flash has more recent training data (up to 2026-03-31), making it potentially better informed about events through that date compared to Seed 2.0 Lite (2024-01-01).

Gemini 3.8 Flash

Mar 2026

2.2 yr newer
Seed 2.0 Lite

Jan 2024

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Gemini 3.8 Flash and Seed 2.0 Lite side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Gemini 3.8 Flash
✓ Preferred
Seed 2.0 Lite
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Gemini 3.8 Flash vs Seed 2.0 Lite.

Which is better, Gemini 3.8 Flash or Seed 2.0 Lite?

Gemini 3.8 Flash leads the LLM Stats Score 50.5 to 31.9. Gemini 3.8 Flash is made by Google and Seed 2.0 Lite is made by ByteDance. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Gemini 3.8 Flash compare to Seed 2.0 Lite in benchmarks?

Gemini 3.8 Flash scores Terminal-Bench 2.1: 89.4%, LVBench: 87.1%, CharXiv-R: 86.2%, LABBench2: 86.2%, DeepSWE 1.1: 73.7%. Seed 2.0 Lite scores AIME 2025: 93.0%, AIME 2026: 88.3%, GPQA: 85.1%, LiveCodeBench v6: 81.7%, SWE-Bench Verified: 73.5%.

What are the context window sizes for Gemini 3.8 Flash and Seed 2.0 Lite?

Gemini 3.8 Flash supports 1.0M tokens and Seed 2.0 Lite supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Gemini 3.8 Flash and Seed 2.0 Lite?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (50.5 vs 31.9). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Gemini 3.8 Flash and Seed 2.0 Lite?

Gemini 3.8 Flash is developed by Google and Seed 2.0 Lite is developed by ByteDance.

Related comparisons