The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Gemini 4 Argon vs Muse Wonder

Gemini 4 Argon leads the LLM Stats Score 55.0 to 49.7. Gemini 4 Argon is 2.0x cheaper per token.

Google · Meta · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Gemini 4 Argon leads the overall LLM Stats Score 55.0 to 49.7, ranking #4 overall.

In the 3 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Gemini 4 Argon wins 2; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

On price, Gemini 4 Argon is roughly 2.0x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Gemini 4 Argon

  • overall performance matters — it scores 55.0 and ranks #4 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning — it leads those capability indexes
  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 2 of 3 exact shared results
  • cost matters — it's about 2.0x cheaper per token

Choose Muse Wonder

  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Oct 2026

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
55.0
#4
49.7
#22
53.0
#6
42.4
#57
42.4
#8
39.5
#12
41.1
#4
37.6
#14
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
2 of 3
1 of 3
Input price
$2.00 / M
$4.00 / M
Output price
$10.00 / M
$20.00 / M
Context window
1,048,576
1,048,576

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

3 shared
Index
Gemini 4 Argon
Muse Wonder
37.1#8
26.6#52
31.8#4
22.4#54
37.2#7
26.6#52
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

19 reported for Gemini 4 Argon · 18 for Muse Wonder

3 shared

Gemini 4 Argon outperforms in 2 benchmarks (Terminal-Bench 4.0, Vals Finance Agent v2), while Muse Wonder is better at 1 benchmark (DeepSWE 1.1).

Gemini 4 Argon shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks.

Mon Oct 19 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Gemini 4 Argon costs less

For input processing, Gemini 4 Argon ($2.00/1M tokens) is 2.0x cheaper than Muse Wonder ($4.00/1M tokens).

For output processing, Gemini 4 Argon ($10.00/1M tokens) is 2.0x cheaper than Muse Wonder ($20.00/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Muse Wonder is more expensive than Gemini 4 Argon.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Mon Oct 19 2026 • llm-stats.com
Google
Gemini 4 Argon
Input tokens$2.00
Output tokens$10.00
Best providerGoogle
Meta
Muse Wonder
Input tokens$4.00
Output tokens$20.00
Best providerMeta
Notice missing or incorrect data?

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Both models have the same input context window of 1,048,576 tokens. Only Gemini 4 Argon specifies output context (1,048,576 tokens).

Google
Gemini 4 Argon
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output1,048,576 tokens
Meta
Muse Wonder
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output- tokens
Mon Oct 19 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Both Gemini 4 Argon and Muse Wonder support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Gemini 4 Argon

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Muse Wonder

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.

Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.

Gemini 4 Argon

Proprietary

Closed source

Muse Wonder

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemini 4 Argon was released on 2026-09-30, while Muse Wonder was released on 2026-10-12.

Muse Wonder is 0 month newer than Gemini 4 Argon.

Gemini 4 Argon

Sep 30, 2026

2 weeks ago

Muse Wonder

Oct 12, 2026

1 weeks ago

1w newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

Gemini 4 Argon is available from Google. Muse Wonder is available from Meta Model API.

Gemini 4 Argon

google logo
Google
Input Price:Input: $2.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $10.00/1M

Muse Wonder

meta logo
Meta
Input Price:Input: $4.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $20.00/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Gemini 4 Argon and Muse Wonder side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Gemini 4 Argon
✓ Preferred
Muse Wonder
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Gemini 4 Argon vs Muse Wonder.

Which is better, Gemini 4 Argon or Muse Wonder?

Gemini 4 Argon leads the LLM Stats Score 55.0 to 49.7. Gemini 4 Argon is made by Google and Muse Wonder is made by Meta. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Gemini 4 Argon compare to Muse Wonder in benchmarks?

Gemini 4 Argon scores Graphwalks BFS <128k: 99.7%, Vibe Code Bench: 91.9%, LVBench: 91.7%, LABBench2: 88.8%, Graphwalks BFS >128k: 84.2%. Muse Wonder scores MemoryBench: 85.6%, DeepSWE 1.1: 78.8%, OSWorld 2.1 (partial): 72.6%, JobBench: 70.5%, HealthBench Professional: 60.5%.

Is Gemini 4 Argon cheaper than Muse Wonder?

Gemini 4 Argon is 2.0x cheaper for input tokens. Gemini 4 Argon costs $2.00/M input and $10.00/M output via google. Muse Wonder costs $4.00/M input and $20.00/M output via meta.

What are the context window sizes for Gemini 4 Argon and Muse Wonder?

Gemini 4 Argon supports 1.0M tokens and Muse Wonder supports 1.0M tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Gemini 4 Argon and Muse Wonder?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (55.0 vs 49.7), input pricing ($2.00 vs $4.00/M). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Gemini 4 Argon and Muse Wonder?

Gemini 4 Argon is developed by Google and Muse Wonder is developed by Meta.