The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Gemma 3 12B vs Particle-1

Particle-1 leads the LLM Stats Score 31.9 to 5.0. Gemma 3 12B is 5.8x cheaper per token.

Google · Particle AI · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Particle-1 leads the overall LLM Stats Score 31.9 to 5.0, ranking #133 overall.

In the 1 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Particle-1 wins 1; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

On price, Gemma 3 12B is roughly 5.8x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

Particle-1 also accepts a larger context window (1,048,576 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Gemma 3 12B

  • cost matters — it's about 5.8x cheaper per token
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

Choose Particle-1

  • overall performance matters — it scores 31.9 and ranks #133 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning — it leads those capability indexes
  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 1 of 1 exact shared results
  • you process long inputs — it offers a 1,048,576 token context window
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Oct 2026

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
5.0
#331
31.9
#133
5.5
#325
31.2
#135
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
0 of 1
1 of 1
Input price
$0.05 / M
$0.25 / M
Output price
$0.15 / M
$1.00 / M
Context window
131,072
1,048,576

Individual benchmarks

26 reported for Gemma 3 12B · 3 for Particle-1

1 shared

Gemma 3 12B outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Particle-1 is better at 1 benchmark (GPQA).

Particle-1 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Mon Nov 02 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Gemma 3 12B costs less

For input processing, Gemma 3 12B ($0.05/1M tokens) is 5.0x cheaper than Particle-1 ($0.25/1M tokens).

For output processing, Gemma 3 12B ($0.15/1M tokens) is 6.7x cheaper than Particle-1 ($1.00/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Particle-1 is more expensive than Gemma 3 12B.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Mon Nov 02 2026 • llm-stats.com
Google
Gemma 3 12B
Input tokens$0.05
Output tokens$0.15
Best providerDeepinfra
Particle AI
Particle-1
Input tokens$0.25
Output tokens$1.00
Best providerUnknown Organization
Notice missing or incorrect data?

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Particle-1 accepts 1,048,576 input tokens compared to Gemma 3 12B's 131,072 tokens. Both models can generate responses up to 131,072 tokens.

Google
Gemma 3 12B
Input131,072 tokens
Output131,072 tokens
Particle AI
Particle-1
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output131,072 tokens
Mon Nov 02 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Both Gemma 3 12B and Particle-1 support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Gemma 3 12B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Particle-1

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Gemma 3 12B is licensed under Gemma, while Particle-1 uses a proprietary license.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Gemma 3 12B

Gemma

Open weights

Particle-1

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemma 3 12B was released on 2025-03-12, while Particle-1 was released on 2026-10-28.

Particle-1 is 20 months newer than Gemma 3 12B.

Gemma 3 12B

Mar 12, 2025

1.6 years ago

Particle-1

Oct 28, 2026

4 days ago

1.6yr newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

Gemma 3 12B is available from DeepInfra. Particle-1 is available from Particle AI.

Gemma 3 12B

deepinfra logo
Deepinfra
Input Price:Input: $0.05/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.15/1M

Particle-1

particle-ai logo
Unknown Organization
Input Price:Input: $0.25/1MOutput Price:Output: $1.00/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Gemma 3 12B and Particle-1 side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Gemma 3 12B
✓ Preferred
Particle-1
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Gemma 3 12B vs Particle-1.

Which is better, Gemma 3 12B or Particle-1?

Particle-1 leads the LLM Stats Score 31.9 to 5.0. Gemma 3 12B is made by Google and Particle-1 is made by Particle AI. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Gemma 3 12B compare to Particle-1 in benchmarks?

Gemma 3 12B scores GSM8k: 94.4%, IFEval: 88.9%, DocVQA: 87.1%, BIG-Bench Hard: 85.7%, HumanEval: 85.4%. Particle-1 scores GPQA: 90.4%, BabyVision: 89.2%, MMLU: 86.1%.

Is Gemma 3 12B cheaper than Particle-1?

Gemma 3 12B is 5.0x cheaper for input tokens. Gemma 3 12B costs $0.05/M input and $0.15/M output via deepinfra. Particle-1 costs $0.25/M input and $1.00/M output via particle-ai.

What are the context window sizes for Gemma 3 12B and Particle-1?

Gemma 3 12B supports 131K tokens and Particle-1 supports 1.0M tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Gemma 3 12B and Particle-1?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (5.0 vs 31.9), context window (131K vs 1.0M), input pricing ($0.05 vs $0.25/M), licensing (Gemma vs Proprietary). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Gemma 3 12B and Particle-1?

Gemma 3 12B is developed by Google and Particle-1 is developed by Particle AI.