The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Gemma 3 1B vs IBM Granite 4.2 3B

IBM Granite 4.2 3B leads the LLM Stats Score 15.6 to -10.3.

Google · IBM · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

IBM Granite 4.2 3B leads the overall LLM Stats Score 15.6 to -10.3, ranking #213 overall.

In the 2 individual benchmarks reported for both models, IBM Granite 4.2 3B wins 2; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Gemma 3 1B

  • you are already invested in the Google ecosystem

Choose IBM Granite 4.2 3B

  • overall performance matters — it scores 15.6 and ranks #213 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning — it leads those capability indexes
  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 2 of 2 exact shared results
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Aug 2026

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
-10.3
#350
15.6
#213
-11.9
#344
12.0
#234
-10.1
#250
-6.7
#247
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
0 of 2
2 of 2
Input price
— / M
— / M
Output price
— / M
— / M
Context window

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared
Index
Gemma 3 1B
IBM Granite 4.2 3B
-8.8#314
13.7#216
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

18 reported for Gemma 3 1B · 13 for IBM Granite 4.2 3B

2 shared

Gemma 3 1B outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while IBM Granite 4.2 3B is better at 2 benchmarks (GPQA, MMLU-Pro).

IBM Granite 4.2 3B significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Tue Sep 01 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

2.0B diff

IBM Granite 4.2 3B has 2.0B more parameters than Gemma 3 1B, making it 200.0% larger.

Google
Gemma 3 1B
1.0Bparameters
IBM
IBM Granite 4.2 3B
3.0Bparameters
1.0B
Gemma 3 1B
3.0B
IBM Granite 4.2 3B

License

Usage and distribution terms

Gemma 3 1B is licensed under Gemma, while IBM Granite 4.2 3B uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Gemma 3 1B

Gemma

Open weights

IBM Granite 4.2 3B

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemma 3 1B was released on 2025-03-12, while IBM Granite 4.2 3B was released on 2026-08-25.

IBM Granite 4.2 3B is 18 months newer than Gemma 3 1B.

Gemma 3 1B

Mar 12, 2025

1.5 years ago

IBM Granite 4.2 3B

Aug 25, 2026

6 days ago

1.5yr newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Gemma 3 1B and IBM Granite 4.2 3B side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Gemma 3 1B
✓ Preferred
IBM Granite 4.2 3B
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Gemma 3 1B vs IBM Granite 4.2 3B.

Which is better, Gemma 3 1B or IBM Granite 4.2 3B?

IBM Granite 4.2 3B leads the LLM Stats Score 15.6 to -10.3. Gemma 3 1B is made by Google and IBM Granite 4.2 3B is made by IBM. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Gemma 3 1B compare to IBM Granite 4.2 3B in benchmarks?

Gemma 3 1B scores IFEval: 80.2%, GSM8k: 62.8%, Natural2Code: 56.0%, MATH: 48.0%, HumanEval: 41.5%. IBM Granite 4.2 3B scores AIME 2025: 78.3%, IFBench: 74.3%, LiveCodeBench v6: 69.7%, MMLU-Pro: 67.8%, RULER 64k: 67.5%.

What are the main differences between Gemma 3 1B and IBM Granite 4.2 3B?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (-10.3 vs 15.6), licensing (Gemma vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Gemma 3 1B and IBM Granite 4.2 3B?

Gemma 3 1B is developed by Google and IBM Granite 4.2 3B is developed by IBM.