The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Gemma 3 1B vs Qwen3.8 Flash

Qwen3.8 Flash leads the LLM Stats Score 49.6 to -10.3.

Google · Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Qwen3.8 Flash leads the overall LLM Stats Score 49.6 to -10.3, ranking #16 overall.

In the 1 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Qwen3.8 Flash wins 1; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Gemma 3 1B

  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

Choose Qwen3.8 Flash

  • overall performance matters — it scores 49.6 and ranks #16 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes
  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 1 of 1 exact shared results
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Aug 2026

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
-10.3
#350
49.6
#16
-11.9
#344
49.2
#16
-10.1
#250
36.6
#20
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
0 of 1
1 of 1
Input price
— / M
$0.15 / M
Output price
— / M
$0.47 / M
Context window
1,000,000

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared
Index
Gemma 3 1B
Qwen3.8 Flash
-8.8#314
32.6#55
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

18 reported for Gemma 3 1B · 22 for Qwen3.8 Flash

1 shared

Gemma 3 1B outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Qwen3.8 Flash is better at 1 benchmark (GPQA).

Qwen3.8 Flash significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Tue Sep 01 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

124.0B diff

Qwen3.8 Flash has 124.0B more parameters than Gemma 3 1B, making it 12400.0% larger.

Google
Gemma 3 1B
1.0Bparameters
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3.8 Flash
125.0Bparameters
1.0B
Gemma 3 1B
125.0B
Qwen3.8 Flash

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Qwen3.8 Flash specifies input context (1,000,000 tokens). Only Qwen3.8 Flash specifies output context (131,072 tokens).

Google
Gemma 3 1B
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3.8 Flash
Input1,000,000 tokens
Output131,072 tokens
Tue Sep 01 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Qwen3.8 Flash supports multimodal inputs, whereas Gemma 3 1B does not.

Qwen3.8 Flash can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Gemma 3 1B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Qwen3.8 Flash

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Gemma 3 1B is licensed under Gemma, while Qwen3.8 Flash uses a proprietary license.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Gemma 3 1B

Gemma

Open weights

Qwen3.8 Flash

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemma 3 1B was released on 2025-03-12, while Qwen3.8 Flash was released on 2026-08-26.

Qwen3.8 Flash is 18 months newer than Gemma 3 1B.

Gemma 3 1B

Mar 12, 2025

1.5 years ago

Qwen3.8 Flash

Aug 26, 2026

6 days ago

1.5yr newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Gemma 3 1B and Qwen3.8 Flash side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Gemma 3 1B
✓ Preferred
Qwen3.8 Flash
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Gemma 3 1B vs Qwen3.8 Flash.

Which is better, Gemma 3 1B or Qwen3.8 Flash?

Qwen3.8 Flash leads the LLM Stats Score 49.6 to -10.3. Gemma 3 1B is made by Google and Qwen3.8 Flash is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Gemma 3 1B compare to Qwen3.8 Flash in benchmarks?

Gemma 3 1B scores IFEval: 80.2%, GSM8k: 62.8%, Natural2Code: 56.0%, MATH: 48.0%, HumanEval: 41.5%. Qwen3.8 Flash scores MathVision: 95.7%, LiveCodeBench v6: 91.9%, GPQA: 91.7%, CharXiv-R: 90.6%, RealWorldQA: 88.5%.

What are the context window sizes for Gemma 3 1B and Qwen3.8 Flash?

Gemma 3 1B supports an unknown number of tokens and Qwen3.8 Flash supports 1.0M tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Gemma 3 1B and Qwen3.8 Flash?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (-10.3 vs 49.6), multimodal support (no vs yes), licensing (Gemma vs Proprietary). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Gemma 3 1B and Qwen3.8 Flash?

Gemma 3 1B is developed by Google and Qwen3.8 Flash is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.