The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Gemma 3 27B vs GPT-6 Cyber

GPT-6 Cyber leads the LLM Stats Score 41.0 to 7.7. Gemma 3 27B is 400.0x cheaper per token.

Google · OpenAI · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

GPT-6 Cyber leads the overall LLM Stats Score 41.0 to 7.7, ranking #77 overall.

On price, Gemma 3 27B is roughly 400.0x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

GPT-6 Cyber also accepts a larger context window (1,050,000 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Gemma 3 27B

  • cost matters — it's about 400.0x cheaper per token
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

Choose GPT-6 Cyber

  • overall performance matters — it scores 41.0 and ranks #77 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes coding — it leads those capability indexes
  • you process long inputs — it offers a 1,050,000 token context window
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Nov 2026

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Gemma 3 27B
Google
GPT-6 Cyber
OpenAI
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
7.7
#321
41.0
#77
Coding
5.2
#235
33.5
#49
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
$0.08 / M
$20.00 / M
Output price
$0.16 / M
$100.00 / M
Context window
131,072
1,050,000

Individual benchmarks

27 reported for Gemma 3 27B · 1 for GPT-6 Cyber

No common benchmarks found

Gemma 3 27B and GPT-6 Cyberdon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Gemma 3 27B costs less

For input processing, Gemma 3 27B ($0.08/1M tokens) is 250.0x cheaper than GPT-6 Cyber ($20.00/1M tokens).

For output processing, Gemma 3 27B ($0.16/1M tokens) is 625.0x cheaper than GPT-6 Cyber ($100.00/1M tokens).

In conclusion, GPT-6 Cyber is more expensive than Gemma 3 27B.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Sun Nov 08 2026 • llm-stats.com
Google
Gemma 3 27B
Input tokens$0.08
Output tokens$0.16
Best providerDeepinfra
OpenAI
GPT-6 Cyber
Input tokens$20.00
Output tokens$100.00
Best providerOpenAI
Notice missing or incorrect data?

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

GPT-6 Cyber accepts 1,050,000 input tokens compared to Gemma 3 27B's 131,072 tokens. Gemma 3 27B can generate longer responses up to 131,072 tokens, while GPT-6 Cyber is limited to 128,000 tokens.

Google
Gemma 3 27B
Input131,072 tokens
Output131,072 tokens
OpenAI
GPT-6 Cyber
Input1,050,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
Sun Nov 08 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Both Gemma 3 27B and GPT-6 Cyber support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Gemma 3 27B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

GPT-6 Cyber

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Gemma 3 27B is licensed under Gemma, while GPT-6 Cyber uses a proprietary license.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Gemma 3 27B

Gemma

Open weights

GPT-6 Cyber

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemma 3 27B was released on 2025-03-12, while GPT-6 Cyber was released on 2026-11-05.

GPT-6 Cyber is 20 months newer than Gemma 3 27B.

Gemma 3 27B

Mar 12, 2025

1.7 years ago

GPT-6 Cyber

Nov 5, 2026

3 days ago

1.7yr newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

Gemma 3 27B is available from DeepInfra, Novita. GPT-6 Cyber is available from OpenAI.

Gemma 3 27B

deepinfra logo
Deepinfra
Input Price:Input: $0.08/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.16/1M
novita logo
Novita
Input Price:Input: $0.11/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.20/1M

GPT-6 Cyber

openai logo
OpenAI
Input Price:Input: $20.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $100.00/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Gemma 3 27B and GPT-6 Cyber side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Gemma 3 27B
✓ Preferred
GPT-6 Cyber
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Gemma 3 27B vs GPT-6 Cyber.

Which is better, Gemma 3 27B or GPT-6 Cyber?

GPT-6 Cyber leads the LLM Stats Score 41.0 to 7.7. Gemma 3 27B is made by Google and GPT-6 Cyber is made by OpenAI. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Gemma 3 27B compare to GPT-6 Cyber in benchmarks?

Gemma 3 27B scores GSM8k: 95.9%, IFEval: 90.4%, MATH: 89.0%, HumanEval: 87.8%, BIG-Bench Hard: 87.6%. GPT-6 Cyber scores ExploitGym: 48.5%.

Is Gemma 3 27B cheaper than GPT-6 Cyber?

Gemma 3 27B is 250.0x cheaper for input tokens. Gemma 3 27B costs $0.08/M input and $0.16/M output via deepinfra. GPT-6 Cyber costs $20.00/M input and $100.00/M output via openai.

What are the context window sizes for Gemma 3 27B and GPT-6 Cyber?

Gemma 3 27B supports 131K tokens and GPT-6 Cyber supports 1.1M tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Gemma 3 27B and GPT-6 Cyber?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (7.7 vs 41.0), context window (131K vs 1.1M), input pricing ($0.08 vs $20.00/M), licensing (Gemma vs Proprietary). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Gemma 3 27B and GPT-6 Cyber?

Gemma 3 27B is developed by Google and GPT-6 Cyber is developed by OpenAI.

Related comparisons