Model Comparison

Gemma 3 4B vs GPT-4o miniWhich is better in 2026?

GPT-4o mini shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks. Gemma 3 4B is 10.5x cheaper per token.

Verdict: Gemma 3 4B vs GPT-4o mini — which is better?

Gemma 3 4B (by Google) and GPT-4o mini (by OpenAI) are two of the AI models people compare most. Here is how they stack up on benchmarks, price and capabilities, and which one to pick in 2026.

Gemma 3 4B outperforms in 1 benchmarks (MATH), while GPT-4o mini is better at 2 benchmarks (GPQA, HumanEval). GPT-4o mini shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks.

On price, Gemma 3 4B is roughly 10.5x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

Gemma 3 4B also accepts a larger context window (131,072 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Choose Gemma 3 4B if…

  • cost matters — it's about 10.5x cheaper per token
  • you process long inputs — it offers a 131,072 token context window
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Mar 2025
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

Choose GPT-4o mini if…

  • you want the strongest raw capability — it leads on 2 of 3 shared benchmarks
Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

3 benchmarks

Gemma 3 4B outperforms in 1 benchmarks (MATH), while GPT-4o mini is better at 2 benchmarks (GPQA, HumanEval).

GPT-4o mini shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks.

Sat Jun 06 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Gemma 3 4B costs less

For input processing, Gemma 3 4B ($0.02/1M tokens) is 7.5x cheaper than GPT-4o mini ($0.15/1M tokens).

For output processing, Gemma 3 4B ($0.04/1M tokens) is 15.0x cheaper than GPT-4o mini ($0.60/1M tokens).

In conclusion, GPT-4o mini is more expensive than Gemma 3 4B.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Sat Jun 06 2026 • llm-stats.com
Google
Gemma 3 4B
Input tokens$0.02
Output tokens$0.04
Best providerDeepinfra
OpenAI
GPT-4o mini
Input tokens$0.15
Output tokens$0.60
Best providerAzure
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Gemma 3 4B accepts 131,072 input tokens compared to GPT-4o mini's 128,000 tokens. Gemma 3 4B can generate longer responses up to 131,072 tokens, while GPT-4o mini is limited to 16,384 tokens.

Google
Gemma 3 4B
Input131,072 tokens
Output131,072 tokens
OpenAI
GPT-4o mini
Input128,000 tokens
Output16,384 tokens
Sat Jun 06 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Both Gemma 3 4B and GPT-4o mini support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Gemma 3 4B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

GPT-4o mini

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Gemma 3 4B is licensed under Gemma, while GPT-4o mini uses a proprietary license.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Gemma 3 4B

Gemma

Open weights

GPT-4o mini

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemma 3 4B was released on 2025-03-12, while GPT-4o mini was released on 2024-07-18.

Gemma 3 4B is 8 months newer than GPT-4o mini.

Gemma 3 4B

Mar 12, 2025

1.2 years ago

7mo newer
GPT-4o mini

Jul 18, 2024

1.9 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemma 3 4B has a knowledge cutoff of 2024-08-01, while GPT-4o mini has a cutoff of 2023-10-01.

Gemma 3 4B has more recent training data (up to 2024-08-01), making it potentially better informed about events through that date compared to GPT-4o mini (2023-10-01).

Gemma 3 4B

Aug 2024

10 mo newer
GPT-4o mini

Oct 2023

Provider Availability

Gemma 3 4B is available from DeepInfra. GPT-4o mini is available from Azure.

Gemma 3 4B

deepinfra logo
Deepinfra
Input Price:Input: $0.02/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.04/1M

GPT-4o mini

azure logo
Azure
Input Price:Input: $0.15/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.60/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

Google
Larger context window (131,072 tokens)
Less expensive input tokens
Less expensive output tokens
Has open weights
Higher MATH score (75.6% vs 70.2%)
OpenAI
Higher GPQA score (40.2% vs 30.8%)
Higher HumanEval score (87.2% vs 71.3%)

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Google
Gemma 3 4B
OpenAI
GPT-4o mini

FAQ

Common questions about Gemma 3 4B vs GPT-4o mini.

Which is better, Gemma 3 4B or GPT-4o mini?

GPT-4o mini shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks. Gemma 3 4B is made by Google and GPT-4o mini is made by OpenAI. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does Gemma 3 4B compare to GPT-4o mini in benchmarks?

Gemma 3 4B scores IFEval: 90.2%, GSM8k: 89.2%, DocVQA: 75.8%, MATH: 75.6%, AI2D: 74.8%. GPT-4o mini scores HumanEval: 87.2%, MGSM: 87.0%, MMLU: 82.0%, DROP: 79.7%, MATH: 70.2%.

Is Gemma 3 4B cheaper than GPT-4o mini?

Gemma 3 4B is 7.5x cheaper for input tokens. Gemma 3 4B costs $0.02/M input and $0.04/M output via deepinfra. GPT-4o mini costs $0.15/M input and $0.60/M output via azure.

What are the context window sizes for Gemma 3 4B and GPT-4o mini?

Gemma 3 4B supports 131K tokens and GPT-4o mini supports 128K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Gemma 3 4B and GPT-4o mini?

Key differences include context window (131K vs 128K), input pricing ($0.02 vs $0.15/M), licensing (Gemma vs Proprietary). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Gemma 3 4B and GPT-4o mini?

Gemma 3 4B is developed by Google and GPT-4o mini is developed by OpenAI.

Related comparisons