Gemma 3 4B vs Muse Wonder
Muse Wonder leads the LLM Stats Score 47.9 to -1.9. Gemma 3 4B is 320.0x cheaper per token.
Google · Meta · Updated for 2026
Which is better?
Muse Wonder leads the overall LLM Stats Score 47.9 to -1.9, ranking #29 overall.
On price, Gemma 3 4B is roughly 320.0x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.
Muse Wonder also accepts a larger context window (1,048,576 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.
Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.
Choose Gemma 3 4B
- cost matters — it's about 320.0x cheaper per token
- you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune
Choose Muse Wonder
- overall performance matters — it scores 47.9 and ranks #29 on LLM Stats
- your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes
- you process long inputs — it offers a 1,048,576 token context window
- you want the most recent training data — it shipped Oct 2026
At a glance
The differences that matter most.
Capability indexes
Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks
Individual benchmarks
26 reported for Gemma 3 4B · 16 for Muse Wonder
Gemma 3 4B and Muse Wonderdon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.
Human preference
Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores
Pricing Analysis
Price comparison per million tokens
For input processing, Gemma 3 4B ($0.02/1M tokens) is 200.0x cheaper than Muse Wonder ($4.00/1M tokens).
For output processing, Gemma 3 4B ($0.04/1M tokens) is 500.0x cheaper than Muse Wonder ($20.00/1M tokens).
In conclusion, Muse Wonder is more expensive than Gemma 3 4B.*
* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens
Context Window
Maximum input and output token capacity
Muse Wonder accepts 1,048,576 input tokens compared to Gemma 3 4B's 131,072 tokens. Only Gemma 3 4B specifies output context (131,072 tokens).
Input capabilities
Documented input modalities across available providers
Both Gemma 3 4B and Muse Wonder support multimodal inputs.
They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.
Gemma 3 4B
Muse Wonder
License
Usage and distribution terms
Gemma 3 4B is licensed under Gemma, while Muse Wonder uses a proprietary license.
License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.
Gemma
Open weights
Proprietary
Closed source
Release Timeline
When each model was launched
Gemma 3 4B was released on 2025-03-12, while Muse Wonder was released on 2026-10-12.
Muse Wonder is 19 months newer than Gemma 3 4B.
Mar 12, 2025
1.6 years ago
Oct 12, 2026
0 days ago
1.6yr newerKnowledge Cutoff
When training data ends
Gemma 3 4B has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2024-08-01, while Muse Wonder's cutoff date is not specified.
We can confirm Gemma 3 4B's training data extends to 2024-08-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without Muse Wonder's cutoff date.
Aug 2024
—
Provider Availability
Gemma 3 4B is available from DeepInfra. Muse Wonder is available from Meta Model API.
Gemma 3 4B
Muse Wonder
Outputs Comparison
Judge for yourself.
Run your own prompts against Gemma 3 4B and Muse Wonder side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.
FAQ
Common questions about Gemma 3 4B vs Muse Wonder.