Model Comparison

Gemma 3 4B vs Phi 4 Reasoning PlusWhich is better in 2026?

Phi 4 Reasoning Plus shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks.

Verdict: Gemma 3 4B vs Phi 4 Reasoning Plus — which is better?

Gemma 3 4B (by Google) and Phi 4 Reasoning Plus (by Microsoft) are two of the AI models people compare most. Here is how they stack up on benchmarks, price and capabilities, and which one to pick in 2026.

Gemma 3 4B outperforms in 1 benchmarks (IFEval), while Phi 4 Reasoning Plus is better at 3 benchmarks (GPQA, LiveCodeBench, MMLU-Pro). Phi 4 Reasoning Plus shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks.

Choose Gemma 3 4B if…

  • you want predictable pricing at $0.02/M input and $0.04/M output

Choose Phi 4 Reasoning Plus if…

  • you want the strongest raw capability — it leads on 3 of 4 shared benchmarks
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Apr 2025

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

4 benchmarks

Gemma 3 4B outperforms in 1 benchmarks (IFEval), while Phi 4 Reasoning Plus is better at 3 benchmarks (GPQA, LiveCodeBench, MMLU-Pro).

Phi 4 Reasoning Plus shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks.

Mon Jun 15 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

10.0B diff

Phi 4 Reasoning Plus has 10.0B more parameters than Gemma 3 4B, making it 250.0% larger.

Google
Gemma 3 4B
4.0Bparameters
Microsoft
Phi 4 Reasoning Plus
14.0Bparameters
4.0B
Gemma 3 4B
14.0B
Phi 4 Reasoning Plus

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Gemma 3 4B specifies input context (131,072 tokens). Only Gemma 3 4B specifies output context (131,072 tokens).

Google
Gemma 3 4B
Input131,072 tokens
Output131,072 tokens
Microsoft
Phi 4 Reasoning Plus
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Mon Jun 15 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Gemma 3 4B supports multimodal inputs, whereas Phi 4 Reasoning Plus does not.

Gemma 3 4B can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Gemma 3 4B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Phi 4 Reasoning Plus

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Gemma 3 4B is licensed under Gemma, while Phi 4 Reasoning Plus uses MIT.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Gemma 3 4B

Gemma

Open weights

Phi 4 Reasoning Plus

MIT

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemma 3 4B was released on 2025-03-12, while Phi 4 Reasoning Plus was released on 2025-04-30.

Phi 4 Reasoning Plus is 2 months newer than Gemma 3 4B.

Gemma 3 4B

Mar 12, 2025

1.3 years ago

Phi 4 Reasoning Plus

Apr 30, 2025

1.1 years ago

1mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemma 3 4B has a knowledge cutoff of 2024-08-01, while Phi 4 Reasoning Plus has a cutoff of 2025-03-01.

Phi 4 Reasoning Plus has more recent training data (up to 2025-03-01), making it potentially better informed about events through that date compared to Gemma 3 4B (2024-08-01).

Gemma 3 4B

Aug 2024

Phi 4 Reasoning Plus

Mar 2025

7 mo newer

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Key Takeaways

Larger context window (131,072 tokens)
Supports multimodal inputs
Higher IFEval score (90.2% vs 84.9%)
Higher GPQA score (68.9% vs 30.8%)
Higher LiveCodeBench score (53.1% vs 12.6%)
Higher MMLU-Pro score (76.0% vs 43.6%)

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Google
Gemma 3 4B
Microsoft
Phi 4 Reasoning Plus

FAQ

Common questions about Gemma 3 4B vs Phi 4 Reasoning Plus.

Which is better, Gemma 3 4B or Phi 4 Reasoning Plus?

Phi 4 Reasoning Plus shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks. Gemma 3 4B is made by Google and Phi 4 Reasoning Plus is made by Microsoft. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does Gemma 3 4B compare to Phi 4 Reasoning Plus in benchmarks?

Gemma 3 4B scores IFEval: 90.2%, GSM8k: 89.2%, DocVQA: 75.8%, MATH: 75.6%, AI2D: 74.8%. Phi 4 Reasoning Plus scores FlenQA: 97.9%, HumanEval+: 92.3%, IFEval: 84.9%, OmniMath: 81.9%, AIME 2024: 81.3%.

What are the context window sizes for Gemma 3 4B and Phi 4 Reasoning Plus?

Gemma 3 4B supports 131K tokens and Phi 4 Reasoning Plus supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Gemma 3 4B and Phi 4 Reasoning Plus?

Key differences include multimodal support (yes vs no), licensing (Gemma vs MIT). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Gemma 3 4B and Phi 4 Reasoning Plus?

Gemma 3 4B is developed by Google and Phi 4 Reasoning Plus is developed by Microsoft.