Model Comparison

Gemma 3 4B vs Qwen2.5-Coder 7B InstructWhich is better in 2026?

Both models are evenly matched across the benchmarks.

Verdict: Gemma 3 4B vs Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct — which is better?

Gemma 3 4B (by Google) and Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct (by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team) are two of the AI models people compare most. Here is how they stack up on benchmarks, price and capabilities, and which one to pick in 2026.

Gemma 3 4B outperforms in 3 benchmarks (GSM8k, MATH, MMLU-Pro), while Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct is better at 3 benchmarks (HumanEval, LiveCodeBench, MBPP). Both models are evenly matched across the benchmarks.

Choose Gemma 3 4B if…

  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Mar 2025

Choose Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct if…

  • you are already invested in the Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team ecosystem
Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

6 benchmarks

Gemma 3 4B outperforms in 3 benchmarks (GSM8k, MATH, MMLU-Pro), while Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct is better at 3 benchmarks (HumanEval, LiveCodeBench, MBPP).

Both models are evenly matched across the benchmarks.

Mon Jun 15 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

3.0B diff

Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct has 3.0B more parameters than Gemma 3 4B, making it 75.0% larger.

Google
Gemma 3 4B
4.0Bparameters
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct
7.0Bparameters
4.0B
Gemma 3 4B
7.0B
Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Gemma 3 4B specifies input context (131,072 tokens). Only Gemma 3 4B specifies output context (131,072 tokens).

Google
Gemma 3 4B
Input131,072 tokens
Output131,072 tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Mon Jun 15 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Gemma 3 4B supports multimodal inputs, whereas Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct does not.

Gemma 3 4B can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Gemma 3 4B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Gemma 3 4B is licensed under Gemma, while Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Gemma 3 4B

Gemma

Open weights

Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemma 3 4B was released on 2025-03-12, while Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct was released on 2024-09-19.

Gemma 3 4B is 6 months newer than Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct.

Gemma 3 4B

Mar 12, 2025

1.3 years ago

5mo newer
Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct

Sep 19, 2024

1.7 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemma 3 4B has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2024-08-01, while Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Gemma 3 4B's training data extends to 2024-08-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct's cutoff date.

Gemma 3 4B

Aug 2024

Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct

—

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

Google
Larger context window (131,072 tokens)
Supports multimodal inputs
Higher GSM8k score (89.2% vs 83.9%)
Higher MATH score (75.6% vs 46.6%)
Higher MMLU-Pro score (43.6% vs 40.1%)
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct

View details

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Higher HumanEval score (88.4% vs 71.3%)
Higher LiveCodeBench score (18.2% vs 12.6%)
Higher MBPP score (83.5% vs 63.2%)

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Google
Gemma 3 4B
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct

FAQ

Common questions about Gemma 3 4B vs Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct.

Which is better, Gemma 3 4B or Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct?

Both models are evenly matched across the benchmarks. Gemma 3 4B is made by Google and Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does Gemma 3 4B compare to Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct in benchmarks?

Gemma 3 4B scores IFEval: 90.2%, GSM8k: 89.2%, DocVQA: 75.8%, MATH: 75.6%, AI2D: 74.8%. Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct scores HumanEval: 88.4%, GSM8k: 83.9%, MBPP: 83.5%, HellaSwag: 76.8%, Winogrande: 72.9%.

What are the context window sizes for Gemma 3 4B and Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct?

Gemma 3 4B supports 131K tokens and Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Gemma 3 4B and Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct?

Key differences include multimodal support (yes vs no), licensing (Gemma vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Gemma 3 4B and Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct?

Gemma 3 4B is developed by Google and Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.

Related comparisons