The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) vs Muse Spark 1.3

Muse Spark 1.3 leads the LLM Stats Score 55.3 to -9.4.

Google · Meta · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Muse Spark 1.3 leads the overall LLM Stats Score 55.3 to -9.4, ranking #5 overall.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)

  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

Choose Muse Spark 1.3

  • overall performance matters — it scores 55.3 and ranks #5 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)
Google
Muse Spark 1.3
Meta
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
-9.4
#353
55.3
#5
Reasoning
-9.7
#345
52.8
#7
Coding
-4.3
#247
41.7
#10
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
— / M
$0.10 / M
Output price
— / M
$0.20 / M
Context window
—
1,048,576

Individual benchmarks

28 reported for Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) · 11 for Muse Spark 1.3

No common benchmarks found

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) and Muse Spark 1.3don't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Muse Spark 1.3 specifies input context (1,048,576 tokens). Only Muse Spark 1.3 specifies output context (943,718 tokens).

Google
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Meta
Muse Spark 1.3
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output943,718 tokens
Sat Sep 05 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Both Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) and Muse Spark 1.3 support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Muse Spark 1.3

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) is licensed under Gemma, while Muse Spark 1.3 uses a proprietary license.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)

Gemma

Open weights

Muse Spark 1.3

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) was released on 2025-05-20, while Muse Spark 1.3 was released on 2026-09-02.

Muse Spark 1.3 is 16 months newer than Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview).

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)

May 20, 2025

1.3 years ago

Muse Spark 1.3

Sep 2, 2026

2 days ago

1.3yr newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2024-06-01, while Muse Spark 1.3's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)'s training data extends to 2024-06-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without Muse Spark 1.3's cutoff date.

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)

Jun 2024

Muse Spark 1.3

—

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) and Muse Spark 1.3 side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)
✓ Preferred
Muse Spark 1.3
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) vs Muse Spark 1.3.

Which is better, Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) or Muse Spark 1.3?

Muse Spark 1.3 leads the LLM Stats Score 55.3 to -9.4. Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) is made by Google and Muse Spark 1.3 is made by Meta. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) compare to Muse Spark 1.3 in benchmarks?

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) scores PIQA: 78.9%, BoolQ: 76.4%, ARC-E: 75.8%, HellaSwag: 72.2%, Winogrande: 66.8%. Muse Spark 1.3 scores MRCR v2 (8-needle): 98.5%, MRCR v2 (8-needle, 512K-1M): 98.1%, DeepSearchQA: 89.4%, Terminal-Bench 2.1: 88.8%, DeepSWE 1.1: 75.4%.

What are the context window sizes for Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) and Muse Spark 1.3?

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) supports an unknown number of tokens and Muse Spark 1.3 supports 1.0M tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) and Muse Spark 1.3?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (-9.4 vs 55.3), licensing (Gemma vs Proprietary). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) and Muse Spark 1.3?

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) is developed by Google and Muse Spark 1.3 is developed by Meta.

Related comparisons