The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) vs Hy4 preview

Hy4 preview leads the LLM Stats Score 51.1 to -9.4.

Google · Tencent · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Hy4 preview leads the overall LLM Stats Score 51.1 to -9.4, ranking #14 overall.

In the 1 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Hy4 preview wins 1; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)

  • you are already invested in the Google ecosystem

Choose Hy4 preview

  • overall performance matters — it scores 51.1 and ranks #14 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes
  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 1 of 1 exact shared results
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Aug 2026

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)
Google
Hy4 preview
Tencent
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
-9.4
#353
51.1
#14
Reasoning
-9.7
#345
50.7
#11
Coding
-4.3
#247
39.8
#12
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
0 of 1
1 of 1
Input price
— / M
— / M
Output price
— / M
— / M
Context window
—
—

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared
Index
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)
Hy4 preview
Math
-6.0#312
39.4#17
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

28 reported for Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) · 32 for Hy4 preview

1 shared

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Hy4 preview is better at 1 benchmark (GPQA).

Hy4 preview significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Sat Sep 05 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

768.1B diff

Hy4 preview has 768.1B more parameters than Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview), making it 40214.1% larger.

Google
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)
1.9Bparameters
Tencent
Hy4 preview
770.0Bparameters
1.9B
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)
770.0B
Hy4 preview

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) supports multimodal inputs, whereas Hy4 preview does not.

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Hy4 preview

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) is licensed under Gemma, while Hy4 preview uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)

Gemma

Open weights

Hy4 preview

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) was released on 2025-05-20, while Hy4 preview was released on 2026-08-28.

Hy4 preview is 16 months newer than Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview).

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)

May 20, 2025

1.3 years ago

Hy4 preview

Aug 28, 2026

1 weeks ago

1.3yr newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2024-06-01, while Hy4 preview's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)'s training data extends to 2024-06-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without Hy4 preview's cutoff date.

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)

Jun 2024

Hy4 preview

—

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) and Hy4 preview side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)
✓ Preferred
Hy4 preview
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) vs Hy4 preview.

Which is better, Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) or Hy4 preview?

Hy4 preview leads the LLM Stats Score 51.1 to -9.4. Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) is made by Google and Hy4 preview is made by Tencent. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) compare to Hy4 preview in benchmarks?

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) scores PIQA: 78.9%, BoolQ: 76.4%, ARC-E: 75.8%, HellaSwag: 72.2%, Winogrande: 66.8%. Hy4 preview scores GPQA: 92.3%, Terminal-Bench 2.1: 85.4%, WideSearch: 83.9%, MCP Atlas: 83.7%, SWE-bench Multilingual: 82.9%.

What are the main differences between Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) and Hy4 preview?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (-9.4 vs 51.1), multimodal support (yes vs no), licensing (Gemma vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) and Hy4 preview?

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) is developed by Google and Hy4 preview is developed by Tencent.

Related comparisons