Model Comparison

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) vs Qwen2.5 VL 32B InstructWhich is better in 2026?

Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Verdict: Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) vs Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct — which is better?

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) (by Google) and Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct (by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team) are two of the AI models people compare most. Here is how they stack up on benchmarks, price and capabilities, and which one to pick in 2026.

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct is better at 5 benchmarks (GPQA, HumanEval, MBPP, MMLU, MMLU-Pro). Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Choose Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) if…

  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped May 2025

Choose Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct if…

  • you want the strongest raw capability — it leads on 5 of 5 shared benchmarks
Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

5 benchmarks

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct is better at 5 benchmarks (GPQA, HumanEval, MBPP, MMLU, MMLU-Pro).

Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Sat Jun 13 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

31.6B diff

Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct has 31.6B more parameters than Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview), making it 1653.9% larger.

Google
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)
1.9Bparameters
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct
33.5Bparameters
1.9B
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)
33.5B
Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Both Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) and Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) is licensed under Gemma, while Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)

Gemma

Open weights

Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) was released on 2025-05-20, while Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct was released on 2025-02-28.

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) is 3 months newer than Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct.

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)

May 20, 2025

1.1 years ago

2mo newer
Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct

Feb 28, 2025

1.3 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2024-06-01, while Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)'s training data extends to 2024-06-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct's cutoff date.

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)

Jun 2024

Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct

—

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

Google

No standout differentiators in the data we have for this pair.

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct

View details

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Higher GPQA score (46.0% vs 24.8%)
Higher HumanEval score (91.5% vs 66.5%)
Higher MBPP score (84.0% vs 56.6%)
Higher MMLU score (78.4% vs 60.1%)
Higher MMLU-Pro score (68.8% vs 40.5%)

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Google
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct

FAQ

Common questions about Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) vs Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct.

Which is better, Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) or Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct?

Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) is made by Google and Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) compare to Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct in benchmarks?

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) scores PIQA: 78.9%, BoolQ: 76.4%, ARC-E: 75.8%, HellaSwag: 72.2%, Winogrande: 66.8%. Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct scores DocVQA: 94.8%, Android Control Low_EM: 93.3%, HumanEval: 91.5%, ScreenSpot: 88.5%, MBPP: 84.0%.

What are the main differences between Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) and Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct?

Key differences include licensing (Gemma vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) and Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct?

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) is developed by Google and Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.

Related comparisons