The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed vs Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct

Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct leads the LLM Stats Score 2.2 to -4.5. Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct is 277.8x cheaper per token.

Google · Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct leads the overall LLM Stats Score 2.2 to -4.5, ranking #305 overall.

In the 5 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct wins 4; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

On price, Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct is roughly 277.8x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct also accepts a larger context window (128,000 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Gemma 3n E4B Instructed

  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Jun 2025

Choose Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct

  • overall performance matters — it scores 2.2 and ranks #305 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes
  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 4 of 5 exact shared results
  • cost matters — it's about 277.8x cheaper per token
  • you process long inputs — it offers a 128,000 token context window
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
-4.5
#338
2.2
#305
-5.4
#336
2.2
#294
-0.0
#233
10.1
#158
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
1 of 5
4 of 5
Input price
$20.00 / M
$0.09 / M
Output price
$40.00 / M
$0.09 / M
Context window
32,000
128,000

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

3 shared
Index
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct
-1.4#297
5.4#265
-4.0#204
1.6#180
-4.0#189
0.0#176
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

18 reported for Gemma 3n E4B Instructed · 15 for Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct

5 shared

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed outperforms in 1 benchmarks (MMLU-Pro), while Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct is better at 4 benchmarks (HumanEval, LiveCodeBench, MBPP, MMLU).

Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Sat Sep 05 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct costs less

For input processing, Gemma 3n E4B Instructed ($20.00/1M tokens) is 222.2x more expensive than Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct ($0.09/1M tokens).

For output processing, Gemma 3n E4B Instructed ($40.00/1M tokens) is 444.4x more expensive than Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct ($0.09/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Gemma 3n E4B Instructed is more expensive than Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Sat Sep 05 2026 • llm-stats.com
Google
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
Input tokens$20.00
Output tokens$40.00
Best providerTogether
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct
Input tokens$0.09
Output tokens$0.09
Best providerLambda
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

24.0B diff

Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct has 24.0B more parameters than Gemma 3n E4B Instructed, making it 300.0% larger.

Google
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
8.0Bparameters
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct
32.0Bparameters
8.0B
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
32.0B
Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct accepts 128,000 input tokens compared to Gemma 3n E4B Instructed's 32,000 tokens. Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct can generate longer responses up to 128,000 tokens, while Gemma 3n E4B Instructed is limited to 32,000 tokens.

Google
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
Input32,000 tokens
Output32,000 tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct
Input128,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
Sat Sep 05 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed supports multimodal inputs, whereas Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct does not.

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed is licensed under a proprietary license, while Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed

Proprietary

Closed source

Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed was released on 2025-06-26, while Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct was released on 2024-09-19.

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed is 9 months newer than Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct.

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed

Jun 26, 2025

1.2 years ago

9mo newer
Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct

Sep 19, 2024

2.0 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2024-06-01, while Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Gemma 3n E4B Instructed's training data extends to 2024-06-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct's cutoff date.

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed

Jun 2024

Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct

Provider Availability

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed is available from Together. Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct is available from Lambda, DeepInfra, Hyperbolic, Fireworks.

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed

together logo
Together
Input Price:Input: $20.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $40.00/1M

Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct

lambda logo
Lambda
Input Price:Input: $0.09/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.09/1M
deepinfra logo
Deepinfra
Input Price:Input: $0.18/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.18/1M
hyperbolic logo
Hyperbolic
Input Price:Input: $0.20/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.20/1M
fireworks logo
Fireworks
Input Price:Input: $0.89/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.89/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Gemma 3n E4B Instructed and Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
✓ Preferred
Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Gemma 3n E4B Instructed vs Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct.

Which is better, Gemma 3n E4B Instructed or Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct?

Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct leads the LLM Stats Score 2.2 to -4.5. Gemma 3n E4B Instructed is made by Google and Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Gemma 3n E4B Instructed compare to Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct in benchmarks?

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed scores HumanEval: 75.0%, MGSM: 67.0%, MMLU: 64.9%, Global-MMLU-Lite: 64.5%, MBPP: 63.6%. Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct scores HumanEval: 92.7%, GSM8k: 91.1%, MBPP: 90.2%, HellaSwag: 83.0%, Winogrande: 80.8%.

Is Gemma 3n E4B Instructed cheaper than Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct?

Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct is 222.2x cheaper for input tokens. Gemma 3n E4B Instructed costs $20.00/M input and $40.00/M output via together. Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct costs $0.09/M input and $0.09/M output via lambda.

What are the context window sizes for Gemma 3n E4B Instructed and Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct?

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed supports 32K tokens and Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct supports 128K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Gemma 3n E4B Instructed and Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (-4.5 vs 2.2), context window (32K vs 128K), input pricing ($20.00 vs $0.09/M), multimodal support (yes vs no), licensing (Proprietary vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Gemma 3n E4B Instructed and Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct?

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed is developed by Google and Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.