The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed vs Muse Spark Open

Muse Spark Open leads the LLM Stats Score 44.9 to -5.0. Muse Spark Open is 12.5x cheaper per token.

Google · Meta · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Muse Spark Open leads the overall LLM Stats Score 44.9 to -5.0, ranking #43 overall.

In the 1 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Muse Spark Open wins 1; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

On price, Muse Spark Open is roughly 12.5x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

Muse Spark Open also accepts a larger context window (1,048,576 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Gemma 3n E4B Instructed

  • you want predictable pricing at $20.00/M input and $40.00/M output

Choose Muse Spark Open

  • overall performance matters — it scores 44.9 and ranks #43 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes
  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 1 of 1 exact shared results
  • cost matters — it's about 12.5x cheaper per token
  • you process long inputs — it offers a 1,048,576 token context window
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Oct 2026
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
-5.0
#374
44.9
#43
-5.8
#373
45.2
#39
-0.2
#264
33.0
#42
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
0 of 1
1 of 1
Input price
$20.00 / M
$1.25 / M
Output price
$40.00 / M
$4.25 / M
Context window
32,000
1,048,576

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared
Index
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
Muse Spark Open
-1.8#318
31.6#69
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

18 reported for Gemma 3n E4B Instructed · 17 for Muse Spark Open

1 shared

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Muse Spark Open is better at 1 benchmark (GPQA).

Muse Spark Open significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Tue Oct 20 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Muse Spark Open costs less

For input processing, Gemma 3n E4B Instructed ($20.00/1M tokens) is 16.0x more expensive than Muse Spark Open ($1.25/1M tokens).

For output processing, Gemma 3n E4B Instructed ($40.00/1M tokens) is 9.4x more expensive than Muse Spark Open ($4.25/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Gemma 3n E4B Instructed is more expensive than Muse Spark Open.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Tue Oct 20 2026 • llm-stats.com
Google
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
Input tokens$20.00
Output tokens$40.00
Best providerTogether
Meta
Muse Spark Open
Input tokens$1.25
Output tokens$4.25
Best providerTogether
Notice missing or incorrect data?

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

808.0B diff

Muse Spark Open has 808.0B more parameters than Gemma 3n E4B Instructed, making it 10100.0% larger.

Google
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
8.0Bparameters
Meta
Muse Spark Open
816.0Bparameters
8.0B
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
816.0B
Muse Spark Open

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Muse Spark Open accepts 1,048,576 input tokens compared to Gemma 3n E4B Instructed's 32,000 tokens. Muse Spark Open can generate longer responses up to 1,048,576 tokens, while Gemma 3n E4B Instructed is limited to 32,000 tokens.

Google
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
Input32,000 tokens
Output32,000 tokens
Meta
Muse Spark Open
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output1,048,576 tokens
Tue Oct 20 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Both Gemma 3n E4B Instructed and Muse Spark Open support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Muse Spark Open

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed is licensed under a proprietary license, while Muse Spark Open uses Muse Model License.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed

Proprietary

Closed source

Muse Spark Open

Muse Model License

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed was released on 2025-06-26, while Muse Spark Open was released on 2026-10-15.

Muse Spark Open is 16 months newer than Gemma 3n E4B Instructed.

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed

Jun 26, 2025

1.3 years ago

Muse Spark Open

Oct 15, 2026

4 days ago

1.3yr newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2024-06-01, while Muse Spark Open's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Gemma 3n E4B Instructed's training data extends to 2024-06-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without Muse Spark Open's cutoff date.

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed

Jun 2024

Muse Spark Open

—

Provider Availability

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed is available from Together. Muse Spark Open is available from Together.

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed

together logo
Together
Input Price:Input: $20.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $40.00/1M

Muse Spark Open

together logo
Together
Input Price:Input: $1.25/1MOutput Price:Output: $4.25/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Gemma 3n E4B Instructed and Muse Spark Open side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
✓ Preferred
Muse Spark Open
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Gemma 3n E4B Instructed vs Muse Spark Open.

Which is better, Gemma 3n E4B Instructed or Muse Spark Open?

Muse Spark Open leads the LLM Stats Score 44.9 to -5.0. Gemma 3n E4B Instructed is made by Google and Muse Spark Open is made by Meta. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Gemma 3n E4B Instructed compare to Muse Spark Open in benchmarks?

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed scores HumanEval: 75.0%, MGSM: 67.0%, MMLU: 64.9%, Global-MMLU-Lite: 64.5%, MBPP: 63.6%. Muse Spark Open scores MCP Atlas: 89.2%, GPQA: 89.0%, OSWorld-Verified: 80.4%, BabyVision: 80.2%, Terminal-Bench 2.1: 76.4%.

Is Gemma 3n E4B Instructed cheaper than Muse Spark Open?

Muse Spark Open is 16.0x cheaper for input tokens. Gemma 3n E4B Instructed costs $20.00/M input and $40.00/M output via together. Muse Spark Open costs $1.25/M input and $4.25/M output via together.

What are the context window sizes for Gemma 3n E4B Instructed and Muse Spark Open?

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed supports 32K tokens and Muse Spark Open supports 1.0M tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Gemma 3n E4B Instructed and Muse Spark Open?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (-5.0 vs 44.9), context window (32K vs 1.0M), input pricing ($20.00 vs $1.25/M), licensing (Proprietary vs Muse Model License). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Gemma 3n E4B Instructed and Muse Spark Open?

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed is developed by Google and Muse Spark Open is developed by Meta.