The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed vs MiniMax M3.1 Flash

MiniMax M3.1 Flash leads the LLM Stats Score 48.5 to -5.0. MiniMax M3.1 Flash is 95.2x cheaper per token.

Google · MiniMax · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

MiniMax M3.1 Flash leads the overall LLM Stats Score 48.5 to -5.0, ranking #29 overall.

On price, MiniMax M3.1 Flash is roughly 95.2x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

MiniMax M3.1 Flash also accepts a larger context window (1,000,000 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Gemma 3n E4B Instructed

  • you want predictable pricing at $20.00/M input and $40.00/M output

Choose MiniMax M3.1 Flash

  • overall performance matters — it scores 48.5 and ranks #29 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes
  • cost matters — it's about 95.2x cheaper per token
  • you process long inputs — it offers a 1,000,000 token context window
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Oct 2026

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
Google
MiniMax M3.1 Flash
MiniMax
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
-5.0
#374
48.5
#29
Reasoning
-5.8
#373
45.8
#34
Coding
-0.2
#264
37.8
#23
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
$20.00 / M
$0.15 / M
Output price
$40.00 / M
$0.60 / M
Context window
32,000
1,000,000

Individual benchmarks

18 reported for Gemma 3n E4B Instructed · 15 for MiniMax M3.1 Flash

No common benchmarks found

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed and MiniMax M3.1 Flashdon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

MiniMax M3.1 Flash costs less

For input processing, Gemma 3n E4B Instructed ($20.00/1M tokens) is 133.3x more expensive than MiniMax M3.1 Flash ($0.15/1M tokens).

For output processing, Gemma 3n E4B Instructed ($40.00/1M tokens) is 66.7x more expensive than MiniMax M3.1 Flash ($0.60/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Gemma 3n E4B Instructed is more expensive than MiniMax M3.1 Flash.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Tue Oct 20 2026 • llm-stats.com
Google
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
Input tokens$20.00
Output tokens$40.00
Best providerTogether
MiniMax
MiniMax M3.1 Flash
Input tokens$0.15
Output tokens$0.60
Best providerMiniMax
Notice missing or incorrect data?

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

MiniMax M3.1 Flash accepts 1,000,000 input tokens compared to Gemma 3n E4B Instructed's 32,000 tokens. MiniMax M3.1 Flash can generate longer responses up to 524,288 tokens, while Gemma 3n E4B Instructed is limited to 32,000 tokens.

Google
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
Input32,000 tokens
Output32,000 tokens
MiniMax
MiniMax M3.1 Flash
Input1,000,000 tokens
Output524,288 tokens
Tue Oct 20 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Both Gemma 3n E4B Instructed and MiniMax M3.1 Flash support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed

Text
Images
Audio
Video

MiniMax M3.1 Flash

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.

Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed

Proprietary

Closed source

MiniMax M3.1 Flash

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed was released on 2025-06-26, while MiniMax M3.1 Flash was released on 2026-10-19.

MiniMax M3.1 Flash is 16 months newer than Gemma 3n E4B Instructed.

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed

Jun 26, 2025

1.3 years ago

MiniMax M3.1 Flash

Oct 19, 2026

0 days ago

1.3yr newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2024-06-01, while MiniMax M3.1 Flash's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Gemma 3n E4B Instructed's training data extends to 2024-06-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without MiniMax M3.1 Flash's cutoff date.

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed

Jun 2024

MiniMax M3.1 Flash

—

Provider Availability

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed is available from Together. MiniMax M3.1 Flash is available from MiniMax.

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed

together logo
Together
Input Price:Input: $20.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $40.00/1M

MiniMax M3.1 Flash

minimax logo
MiniMax
Input Price:Input: $0.15/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.60/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Gemma 3n E4B Instructed and MiniMax M3.1 Flash side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
✓ Preferred
MiniMax M3.1 Flash
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Gemma 3n E4B Instructed vs MiniMax M3.1 Flash.

Which is better, Gemma 3n E4B Instructed or MiniMax M3.1 Flash?

MiniMax M3.1 Flash leads the LLM Stats Score 48.5 to -5.0. Gemma 3n E4B Instructed is made by Google and MiniMax M3.1 Flash is made by MiniMax. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Gemma 3n E4B Instructed compare to MiniMax M3.1 Flash in benchmarks?

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed scores HumanEval: 75.0%, MGSM: 67.0%, MMLU: 64.9%, Global-MMLU-Lite: 64.5%, MBPP: 63.6%. MiniMax M3.1 Flash scores BabyVision: 91.0%, CharXiv-R: 82.5%, CyberGym: 82.2%, BankerToolBench: 76.2%, DeepSWE 1.1: 73.7%.

Is Gemma 3n E4B Instructed cheaper than MiniMax M3.1 Flash?

MiniMax M3.1 Flash is 133.3x cheaper for input tokens. Gemma 3n E4B Instructed costs $20.00/M input and $40.00/M output via together. MiniMax M3.1 Flash costs $0.15/M input and $0.60/M output via minimax.

What are the context window sizes for Gemma 3n E4B Instructed and MiniMax M3.1 Flash?

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed supports 32K tokens and MiniMax M3.1 Flash supports 1.0M tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Gemma 3n E4B Instructed and MiniMax M3.1 Flash?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (-5.0 vs 48.5), context window (32K vs 1.0M), input pricing ($20.00 vs $0.15/M). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Gemma 3n E4B Instructed and MiniMax M3.1 Flash?

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed is developed by Google and MiniMax M3.1 Flash is developed by MiniMax.

Related comparisons