The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Gemma 3n E4B vs Grok 4.7

Grok 4.7 leads the LLM Stats Score 48.5 to -6.2.

Google · xAI · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Grok 4.7 leads the overall LLM Stats Score 48.5 to -6.2, ranking #23 overall.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Gemma 3n E4B

  • you are already invested in the Google ecosystem

Choose Grok 4.7

  • overall performance matters — it scores 48.5 and ranks #23 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning — it leads those capability indexes
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Gemma 3n E4B
Google
Grok 4.7
xAI
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
-6.2
#364
48.5
#23
Reasoning
-6.4
#356
37.4
#69
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
— / M
$2.00 / M
Output price
— / M
$6.00 / M
Context window
—
500,000

Individual benchmarks

11 reported for Gemma 3n E4B · 23 for Grok 4.7

No common benchmarks found

Gemma 3n E4B and Grok 4.7don't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Grok 4.7 specifies input context (500,000 tokens).

Google
Gemma 3n E4B
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
xAI
Grok 4.7
Input500,000 tokens
Output- tokens
Tue Sep 22 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Both Gemma 3n E4B and Grok 4.7 support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Gemma 3n E4B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Grok 4.7

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.

Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.

Gemma 3n E4B

Proprietary

Closed source

Grok 4.7

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemma 3n E4B was released on 2025-06-26, while Grok 4.7 was released on 2026-09-21.

Grok 4.7 is 15 months newer than Gemma 3n E4B.

Gemma 3n E4B

Jun 26, 2025

1.2 years ago

Grok 4.7

Sep 21, 2026

1 days ago

1.2yr newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemma 3n E4B has a knowledge cutoff of 2024-06-01, while Grok 4.7 has a cutoff of 2026-06-01.

Grok 4.7 has more recent training data (up to 2026-06-01), making it potentially better informed about events through that date compared to Gemma 3n E4B (2024-06-01).

Gemma 3n E4B

Jun 2024

Grok 4.7

Jun 2026

2 yr newer

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Gemma 3n E4B and Grok 4.7 side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Gemma 3n E4B
✓ Preferred
Grok 4.7
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Gemma 3n E4B vs Grok 4.7.

Which is better, Gemma 3n E4B or Grok 4.7?

Grok 4.7 leads the LLM Stats Score 48.5 to -6.2. Gemma 3n E4B is made by Google and Grok 4.7 is made by xAI. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Gemma 3n E4B compare to Grok 4.7 in benchmarks?

Gemma 3n E4B scores ARC-E: 81.6%, BoolQ: 81.6%, PIQA: 81.0%, HellaSwag: 78.6%, Winogrande: 71.7%. Grok 4.7 scores BixBench MCQ: 88.4%, WMDP-Bio: 88.1%, WMDP-Cyber: 88.1%, WMDP-Chem: 84.9%, CyberGym: 80.3%.

What are the context window sizes for Gemma 3n E4B and Grok 4.7?

Gemma 3n E4B supports an unknown number of tokens and Grok 4.7 supports 500K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Gemma 3n E4B and Grok 4.7?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (-6.2 vs 48.5). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Gemma 3n E4B and Grok 4.7?

Gemma 3n E4B is developed by Google and Grok 4.7 is developed by xAI.

Related comparisons