The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Gemma 3n E4B vs o1

o1 leads the LLM Stats Score 20.9 to -6.2.

Google · OpenAI · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

o1 leads the overall LLM Stats Score 20.9 to -6.2, ranking #191 overall.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Gemma 3n E4B

  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Jun 2025

Choose o1

  • overall performance matters — it scores 20.9 and ranks #191 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning — it leads those capability indexes

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
-6.2
#361
20.9
#191
-6.4
#353
21.3
#181
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
Input price
— / M
$15.00 / M
Output price
— / M
$60.00 / M
Context window
200,000

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared
Index
Gemma 3n E4B
o1
-2.8#312
24.0#121
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

11 reported for Gemma 3n E4B · 19 for o1

No common benchmarks found

Gemma 3n E4B and o1don't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only o1 specifies input context (200,000 tokens). Only o1 specifies output context (100,000 tokens).

Google
Gemma 3n E4B
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
OpenAI
o1
Input200,000 tokens
Output100,000 tokens
Sun Sep 20 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Gemma 3n E4B supports multimodal inputs, whereas o1 does not.

Gemma 3n E4B can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Gemma 3n E4B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

o1

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.

Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.

Gemma 3n E4B

Proprietary

Closed source

o1

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemma 3n E4B was released on 2025-06-26, while o1 was released on 2024-12-17.

Gemma 3n E4B is 6 months newer than o1.

Gemma 3n E4B

Jun 26, 2025

1.2 years ago

6mo newer
o1

Dec 17, 2024

1.8 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemma 3n E4B has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2024-06-01, while o1's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Gemma 3n E4B's training data extends to 2024-06-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without o1's cutoff date.

Gemma 3n E4B

Jun 2024

o1

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Gemma 3n E4B and o1 side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Gemma 3n E4B
✓ Preferred
o1
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Gemma 3n E4B vs o1.

Which is better, Gemma 3n E4B or o1?

o1 leads the LLM Stats Score 20.9 to -6.2. Gemma 3n E4B is made by Google and o1 is made by OpenAI. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Gemma 3n E4B compare to o1 in benchmarks?

Gemma 3n E4B scores ARC-E: 81.6%, BoolQ: 81.6%, PIQA: 81.0%, HellaSwag: 78.6%, Winogrande: 71.7%. o1 scores GSM8k: 97.1%, MATH: 96.4%, GPQA Physics: 92.8%, MMLU: 91.8%, MGSM: 89.3%.

What are the context window sizes for Gemma 3n E4B and o1?

Gemma 3n E4B supports an unknown number of tokens and o1 supports 200K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Gemma 3n E4B and o1?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (-6.2 vs 20.9), multimodal support (yes vs no). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Gemma 3n E4B and o1?

Gemma 3n E4B is developed by Google and o1 is developed by OpenAI.