Model Comparison

Gemma 3n E4B vs Qwen2.5-Coder 7B InstructWhich is better in 2026?

Gemma 3n E4B shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks.

Verdict: Gemma 3n E4B vs Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct — which is better?

Gemma 3n E4B (by Google) and Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct (by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team) are two of the AI models people compare most. Here is how they stack up on benchmarks, price and capabilities, and which one to pick in 2026.

Gemma 3n E4B outperforms in 2 benchmarks (ARC-C, HellaSwag), while Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct is better at 1 benchmark (Winogrande). Gemma 3n E4B shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks.

Choose Gemma 3n E4B if…

  • you want the strongest raw capability — it leads on 2 of 3 shared benchmarks
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Jun 2025

Choose Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct if…

  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

3 benchmarks

Gemma 3n E4B outperforms in 2 benchmarks (ARC-C, HellaSwag), while Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct is better at 1 benchmark (Winogrande).

Gemma 3n E4B shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks.

Wed Jun 24 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

1.0B diff

Gemma 3n E4B has 1.0B more parameters than Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct, making it 14.3% larger.

Google
Gemma 3n E4B
8.0Bparameters
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct
7.0Bparameters
8.0B
Gemma 3n E4B
7.0B
Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Gemma 3n E4B supports multimodal inputs, whereas Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct does not.

Gemma 3n E4B can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Gemma 3n E4B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Gemma 3n E4B is licensed under a proprietary license, while Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Gemma 3n E4B

Proprietary

Closed source

Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemma 3n E4B was released on 2025-06-26, while Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct was released on 2024-09-19.

Gemma 3n E4B is 9 months newer than Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct.

Gemma 3n E4B

Jun 26, 2025

12 months ago

9mo newer
Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct

Sep 19, 2024

1.8 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemma 3n E4B has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2024-06-01, while Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Gemma 3n E4B's training data extends to 2024-06-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct's cutoff date.

Gemma 3n E4B

Jun 2024

Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Key Takeaways

Supports multimodal inputs
Higher ARC-C score (61.6% vs 60.9%)
Higher HellaSwag score (78.6% vs 76.8%)
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct

View details

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Has open weights
Higher Winogrande score (72.9% vs 71.7%)

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Google
Gemma 3n E4B
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct

FAQ

Common questions about Gemma 3n E4B vs Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct.

Which is better, Gemma 3n E4B or Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct?

Gemma 3n E4B shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks. Gemma 3n E4B is made by Google and Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does Gemma 3n E4B compare to Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct in benchmarks?

Gemma 3n E4B scores ARC-E: 81.6%, BoolQ: 81.6%, PIQA: 81.0%, HellaSwag: 78.6%, Winogrande: 71.7%. Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct scores HumanEval: 88.4%, GSM8k: 83.9%, MBPP: 83.5%, HellaSwag: 76.8%, Winogrande: 72.9%.

What are the main differences between Gemma 3n E4B and Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct?

Key differences include multimodal support (yes vs no), licensing (Proprietary vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Gemma 3n E4B and Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct?

Gemma 3n E4B is developed by Google and Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.