Gemma 4 E4B vs Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB)
Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) leads the LLM Stats Score 29.6 to 13.3.
Google · NVIDIA · Updated for 2026
Which is better?
Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) leads the overall LLM Stats Score 29.6 to 13.3, ranking #146 overall.
In the 1 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) wins 1; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.
Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.
Choose Gemma 4 E4B
- you want predictable pricing at $0.02/M input and $0.10/M output
Choose Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB)
- overall performance matters — it scores 29.6 and ranks #146 on LLM Stats
- your work emphasizes reasoning — it leads those capability indexes
- you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 1 of 1 exact shared results
- you want the most recent training data — it shipped Oct 2026
At a glance
The differences that matter most.
Capability indexes
Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks
Individual benchmarks
11 reported for Gemma 4 E4B · 10 for Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB)
Gemma 4 E4B outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) is better at 1 benchmark (GPQA).
Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.
Human preference
Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores
Model Size
Parameter count comparison
Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) has 66.0B more parameters than Gemma 4 E4B, making it 825.0% larger.
Context Window
Maximum input and output token capacity
Only Gemma 4 E4B specifies input context (131,072 tokens). Only Gemma 4 E4B specifies output context (131,072 tokens).
Input capabilities
Documented input modalities across available providers
Both Gemma 4 E4B and Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) support multimodal inputs.
They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.
Gemma 4 E4B
Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB)
License
Usage and distribution terms
Gemma 4 E4B is licensed under Apache 2.0, while Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) uses OpenMDW License v1.1.
License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.
Apache 2.0
Open weights
OpenMDW License v1.1
Open weights
Release Timeline
When each model was launched
Gemma 4 E4B was released on 2026-04-02, while Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) was released on 2026-10-15.
Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) is 7 months newer than Gemma 4 E4B.
Apr 2, 2026
6 months ago
Oct 15, 2026
1 weeks ago
6mo newerKnowledge Cutoff
When training data ends
Gemma 4 E4B has a knowledge cutoff of 2025-01-01, while Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) has a cutoff of 2026-05-01.
Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) has more recent training data (up to 2026-05-01), making it potentially better informed about events through that date compared to Gemma 4 E4B (2025-01-01).
Jan 2025
May 2026
1.3 yr newerOutputs Comparison
Judge for yourself.
Run your own prompts against Gemma 4 E4B and Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.
FAQ
Common questions about Gemma 4 E4B vs Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB).
Related comparisons
More Gemma 4 E4B comparisons
More Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) comparisons
- Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) vs Mercury 3
- Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) vs MiniMax M3.1 Flash
- Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) vs DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017
- Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) vs Beam 1.0
- Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) vs Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)
- Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) vs Muse Spark Open