Model Comparison

GLM-4.5-Air vs MedGemma 4B ITWhich is better in 2026?

Comparing GLM-4.5-Air and MedGemma 4B IT across benchmarks, pricing, and capabilities.

Verdict: GLM-4.5-Air vs MedGemma 4B IT — which is better?

GLM-4.5-Air (by Zhipu AI) and MedGemma 4B IT (by Google) are two of the AI models people compare most. Here is how they stack up on benchmarks, price and capabilities, and which one to pick in 2026.

Choose GLM-4.5-Air if…

  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Jul 2025

Choose MedGemma 4B IT if…

  • you are already invested in the Google ecosystem
Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

No common benchmarks found

GLM-4.5-Air and MedGemma 4B IT don't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

101.7B diff

GLM-4.5-Air has 101.7B more parameters than MedGemma 4B IT, making it 2365.1% larger.

Zhipu AI
GLM-4.5-Air
106.0Bparameters
Google
MedGemma 4B IT
4.3Bparameters
106.0B
GLM-4.5-Air
4.3B
MedGemma 4B IT

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

MedGemma 4B IT supports multimodal inputs, whereas GLM-4.5-Air does not.

MedGemma 4B IT can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

GLM-4.5-Air

Text
Images
Audio
Video

MedGemma 4B IT

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

GLM-4.5-Air is licensed under MIT, while MedGemma 4B IT uses Health AI Developer Foundations terms of use.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

GLM-4.5-Air

MIT

Open weights

MedGemma 4B IT

Health AI Developer Foundations terms of use

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

GLM-4.5-Air was released on 2025-07-28, while MedGemma 4B IT was released on 2025-05-20.

GLM-4.5-Air is 2 months newer than MedGemma 4B IT.

GLM-4.5-Air

Jul 28, 2025

10 months ago

2mo newer
MedGemma 4B IT

May 20, 2025

1.0 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

Zhipu AI

No standout differentiators in the data we have for this pair.

Google
Supports multimodal inputs

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Zhipu AI
GLM-4.5-Air
Google
MedGemma 4B IT

FAQ

Common questions about GLM-4.5-Air vs MedGemma 4B IT.

Which is better, GLM-4.5-Air or MedGemma 4B IT?

GLM-4.5-Air (Zhipu AI) and MedGemma 4B IT (Google) each have strengths in different areas. Compare their benchmark scores, pricing, context windows, and capabilities above to determine which fits your needs.

How does GLM-4.5-Air compare to MedGemma 4B IT in benchmarks?

GLM-4.5-Air scores MATH-500: 98.1%, AIME 2024: 89.4%, MMLU-Pro: 81.4%, TAU-bench Retail: 77.9%, BFCL-v3: 76.4%. MedGemma 4B IT scores MIMIC CXR: 88.9%, DermMCQA: 71.8%, PathMCQA: 69.8%, SlakeVQA: 62.3%, VQA-Rad: 49.9%.

What are the main differences between GLM-4.5-Air and MedGemma 4B IT?

Key differences include multimodal support (no vs yes), licensing (MIT vs Health AI Developer Foundations terms of use). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes GLM-4.5-Air and MedGemma 4B IT?

GLM-4.5-Air is developed by Zhipu AI and MedGemma 4B IT is developed by Google.

Related comparisons