The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

GLM-4.7-Flash vs LongCat-Flash-Chat

GLM-4.7-Flash leads the LLM Stats Score 23.8 to 20.0. GLM-4.7-Flash is 3.4x cheaper per token.

Zhipu AI · Meituan · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

GLM-4.7-Flash leads the overall LLM Stats Score 23.8 to 20.0, ranking #163 overall.

In the 3 individual benchmarks reported for both models, GLM-4.7-Flash wins 2; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

On price, GLM-4.7-Flash is roughly 3.4x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose GLM-4.7-Flash

  • overall performance matters — it scores 23.8 and ranks #163 on LLM Stats
  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 2 of 3 exact shared results
  • cost matters — it's about 3.4x cheaper per token
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Jan 2026

Choose LongCat-Flash-Chat

  • you want predictable pricing at $0.30/M input and $1.20/M output

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

GLM-4.7-Flash
Zhipu AI
LongCat-Flash-Chat
Meituan
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
23.8
#163
20.0
#188
Reasoning
23.8
#153
19.9
#183
Coding
4.6
#199
12.6
#137
Agents
4.9
#141
9.3
#119
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
2 of 3
1 of 3
Input price
$0.07 / M
$0.30 / M
Output price
$0.40 / M
$1.20 / M
Context window
128,000
128,000

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared
Index
GLM-4.7-Flash
LongCat-Flash-Chat
Math
21.2#142
19.2#163
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

6 reported for GLM-4.7-Flash · 16 for LongCat-Flash-Chat

3 shared

GLM-4.7-Flash outperforms in 2 benchmarks (AIME 2025, GPQA), while LongCat-Flash-Chat is better at 1 benchmark (SWE-Bench Verified).

GLM-4.7-Flash shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks.

Mon Sep 07 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

GLM-4.7-Flash costs less

For input processing, GLM-4.7-Flash ($0.07/1M tokens) is 4.3x cheaper than LongCat-Flash-Chat ($0.30/1M tokens).

For output processing, GLM-4.7-Flash ($0.40/1M tokens) is 3.0x cheaper than LongCat-Flash-Chat ($1.20/1M tokens).

In conclusion, LongCat-Flash-Chat is more expensive than GLM-4.7-Flash.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Mon Sep 07 2026 • llm-stats.com
Zhipu AI
GLM-4.7-Flash
Input tokens$0.07
Output tokens$0.40
Best providerUnknown Organization
Meituan
LongCat-Flash-Chat
Input tokens$0.30
Output tokens$1.20
Best providerMeituan
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

530.0B diff

LongCat-Flash-Chat has 530.0B more parameters than GLM-4.7-Flash, making it 1766.7% larger.

Zhipu AI
GLM-4.7-Flash
30.0Bparameters
Meituan
LongCat-Flash-Chat
560.0Bparameters
30.0B
GLM-4.7-Flash
560.0B
LongCat-Flash-Chat

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Both models have the same input context window of 128,000 tokens. LongCat-Flash-Chat can generate longer responses up to 128,000 tokens, while GLM-4.7-Flash is limited to 16,384 tokens.

Zhipu AI
GLM-4.7-Flash
Input128,000 tokens
Output16,384 tokens
Meituan
LongCat-Flash-Chat
Input128,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
Mon Sep 07 2026 • llm-stats.com

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under MIT.

Both models share the same licensing terms, providing consistent usage rights.

GLM-4.7-Flash

MIT

Open weights

LongCat-Flash-Chat

MIT

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

GLM-4.7-Flash was released on 2026-01-19, while LongCat-Flash-Chat was released on 2025-08-29.

GLM-4.7-Flash is 5 months newer than LongCat-Flash-Chat.

GLM-4.7-Flash

Jan 19, 2026

7 months ago

4mo newer
LongCat-Flash-Chat

Aug 29, 2025

1.0 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

GLM-4.7-Flash is available from ZAI. LongCat-Flash-Chat is available from Meituan.

GLM-4.7-Flash

z logo
Unknown Organization
Input Price:Input: $0.07/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.40/1M

LongCat-Flash-Chat

meituan logo
Meituan
Input Price:Input: $0.30/1MOutput Price:Output: $1.20/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against GLM-4.7-Flash and LongCat-Flash-Chat side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

GLM-4.7-Flash
✓ Preferred
LongCat-Flash-Chat
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about GLM-4.7-Flash vs LongCat-Flash-Chat.

Which is better, GLM-4.7-Flash or LongCat-Flash-Chat?

GLM-4.7-Flash leads the LLM Stats Score 23.8 to 20.0. GLM-4.7-Flash is made by Zhipu AI and LongCat-Flash-Chat is made by Meituan. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does GLM-4.7-Flash compare to LongCat-Flash-Chat in benchmarks?

GLM-4.7-Flash scores AIME 2025: 91.6%, Tau-bench: 79.5%, GPQA: 75.2%, SWE-Bench Verified: 59.2%, BrowseComp: 42.8%. LongCat-Flash-Chat scores MATH-500: 96.4%, MMLU: 89.7%, IFEval: 89.6%, ZebraLogic: 89.3%, HumanEval: 88.4%.

Is GLM-4.7-Flash cheaper than LongCat-Flash-Chat?

GLM-4.7-Flash is 4.3x cheaper for input tokens. GLM-4.7-Flash costs $0.07/M input and $0.40/M output via z. LongCat-Flash-Chat costs $0.30/M input and $1.20/M output via meituan.

What are the context window sizes for GLM-4.7-Flash and LongCat-Flash-Chat?

GLM-4.7-Flash supports 128K tokens and LongCat-Flash-Chat supports 128K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between GLM-4.7-Flash and LongCat-Flash-Chat?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (23.8 vs 20.0), input pricing ($0.07 vs $0.30/M). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes GLM-4.7-Flash and LongCat-Flash-Chat?

GLM-4.7-Flash is developed by Zhipu AI and LongCat-Flash-Chat is developed by Meituan.

Related comparisons