The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

GLM-4.7-Flash vs Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)

GLM-4.7-Flash and Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) are closely matched at 23.2 and 22.1 on the LLM Stats Score.

Zhipu AI · NVIDIA · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

GLM-4.7-Flash and Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) are closely matched on the overall LLM Stats Score at 23.2 and 22.1.

In the 3 individual benchmarks reported for both models, GLM-4.7-Flash wins 2; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose GLM-4.7-Flash

  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 2 of 3 exact shared results

Choose Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)

  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Oct 2026

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

GLM-4.7-Flash
Zhipu AI
Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)
NVIDIA
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
23.2
#199
22.1
#202
Reasoning
23.2
#187
19.8
#213
Coding
3.8
#235
2.9
#241
Agents
4.3
#177
-0.7
#198
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
2 of 3
1 of 3
Input price
$0.07 / M
— / M
Output price
$0.40 / M
— / M
Context window
128,000
—

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared
Index
GLM-4.7-Flash
Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)
Math
20.8#164
12.2#245
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

6 reported for GLM-4.7-Flash · 10 for Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)

3 shared

GLM-4.7-Flash outperforms in 2 benchmarks (GPQA, Humanity's Last Exam), while Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) is better at 1 benchmark (SWE-Bench Verified).

GLM-4.7-Flash shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks.

Mon Oct 19 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

26.0B diff

GLM-4.7-Flash has 26.0B more parameters than Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B), making it 650.0% larger.

Zhipu AI
GLM-4.7-Flash
30.0Bparameters
NVIDIA
Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)
4.0Bparameters
30.0B
GLM-4.7-Flash
4.0B
Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only GLM-4.7-Flash specifies input context (128,000 tokens). Only GLM-4.7-Flash specifies output context (16,384 tokens).

Zhipu AI
GLM-4.7-Flash
Input128,000 tokens
Output16,384 tokens
NVIDIA
Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Mon Oct 19 2026 • llm-stats.com

License

Usage and distribution terms

GLM-4.7-Flash is licensed under MIT, while Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) uses OpenMDW License v1.1.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

GLM-4.7-Flash

MIT

Open weights

Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)

OpenMDW License v1.1

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

GLM-4.7-Flash was released on 2026-01-19, while Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) was released on 2026-10-16.

Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) is 9 months newer than GLM-4.7-Flash.

GLM-4.7-Flash

Jan 19, 2026

9 months ago

Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)

Oct 16, 2026

1 days ago

9mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against GLM-4.7-Flash and Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

GLM-4.7-Flash
✓ Preferred
Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about GLM-4.7-Flash vs Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B).

Which is better, GLM-4.7-Flash or Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)?

GLM-4.7-Flash and Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) are closely matched on the LLM Stats Score at 23.2 and 22.1. GLM-4.7-Flash is made by Zhipu AI and Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) is made by NVIDIA. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does GLM-4.7-Flash compare to Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) in benchmarks?

GLM-4.7-Flash scores AIME 2025: 91.6%, Tau-bench: 79.5%, GPQA: 75.2%, SWE-Bench Verified: 59.2%, BrowseComp: 42.8%. Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) scores IFBench: 77.9%, GPQA: 72.4%, AA-LCR: 71.0%, SWE-Bench Verified: 59.5%, SciCode: 34.9%.

What are the context window sizes for GLM-4.7-Flash and Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)?

GLM-4.7-Flash supports 128K tokens and Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between GLM-4.7-Flash and Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (23.2 vs 22.1), licensing (MIT vs OpenMDW License v1.1). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes GLM-4.7-Flash and Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)?

GLM-4.7-Flash is developed by Zhipu AI and Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) is developed by NVIDIA.

Related comparisons