Model Comparison

GLM-5 vs Gemini 3.1 Flash ImageWhich is better in 2026?

Comparing GLM-5 and Gemini 3.1 Flash Image across benchmarks, pricing, and capabilities.

Verdict: GLM-5 vs Gemini 3.1 Flash Image — which is better?

GLM-5 (by Zhipu AI) and Gemini 3.1 Flash Image (by Google) are two of the AI models people compare most. Here is how they stack up on benchmarks, price and capabilities, and which one to pick in 2026.

On price, GLM-5 is roughly 5.1x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

GLM-5 also accepts a larger context window (200,000 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Choose GLM-5 if…

  • cost matters — it's about 5.1x cheaper per token
  • you process long inputs — it offers a 200,000 token context window
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

Choose Gemini 3.1 Flash Image if…

  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Feb 2026
AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Zhipu AI
GLM-5
Google
Gemini 3.1 Flash Image

FAQ

Common questions about GLM-5 vs Gemini 3.1 Flash Image.

Which is better, GLM-5 or Gemini 3.1 Flash Image?

GLM-5 (Zhipu AI) and Gemini 3.1 Flash Image (Google) each have strengths in different areas. Compare their benchmark scores, pricing, context windows, and capabilities above to determine which fits your needs.

How does GLM-5 compare to Gemini 3.1 Flash Image in benchmarks?

GLM-5 scores t2-bench: 89.7%, SWE-Bench Verified: 77.8%, BrowseComp: 75.9%, MCP Atlas: 67.8%, Terminal-Bench 2.0: 56.2%.

Is GLM-5 cheaper than Gemini 3.1 Flash Image?

Gemini 3.1 Flash Image is 2.0x cheaper for input tokens. GLM-5 costs $1.00/M input and $3.20/M output via friendli. Gemini 3.1 Flash Image costs $0.50/M input and $30.00/M output via google.

What are the context window sizes for GLM-5 and Gemini 3.1 Flash Image?

GLM-5 supports 200K tokens and Gemini 3.1 Flash Image supports 66K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between GLM-5 and Gemini 3.1 Flash Image?

Key differences include context window (200K vs 66K), input pricing ($1.00 vs $0.50/M), multimodal support (no vs yes), licensing (MIT vs Proprietary). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes GLM-5 and Gemini 3.1 Flash Image?

GLM-5 is developed by Zhipu AI and Gemini 3.1 Flash Image is developed by Google.

Related comparisons