GLM-5 vs Sarvam-105B Comparison

Comparing GLM-5 and Sarvam-105B across benchmarks, pricing, and capabilities.

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

2 benchmarks

GLM-5 outperforms in 2 benchmarks (BrowseComp, SWE-Bench Verified), while Sarvam-105B is better at 0 benchmarks.

GLM-5 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Tue Mar 17 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Cost data unavailable.

Lowest available price from all providers
Tue Mar 17 2026 • llm-stats.com
Zhipu AI
GLM-5
Input tokens$1.00
Output tokens$3.20
Best providerUnknown Organization
Sarvam AI
Sarvam-105B
Input tokens$0.00
Output tokens$0.00
Best providerUnknown Organization
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

639.0B diff

GLM-5 has 639.0B more parameters than Sarvam-105B, making it 608.6% larger.

Zhipu AI
GLM-5
744.0Bparameters
Sarvam AI
Sarvam-105B
105.0Bparameters
744.0B
GLM-5
105.0B
Sarvam-105B

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only GLM-5 specifies input context (200,000 tokens). Only GLM-5 specifies output context (128,000 tokens).

Zhipu AI
GLM-5
Input200,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
Sarvam AI
Sarvam-105B
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Tue Mar 17 2026 • llm-stats.com

License

Usage and distribution terms

GLM-5 is licensed under MIT, while Sarvam-105B uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

GLM-5

MIT

Open weights

Sarvam-105B

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

GLM-5 was released on 2026-02-11, while Sarvam-105B was released on 2026-03-06.

Sarvam-105B is 1 month newer than GLM-5.

GLM-5

Feb 11, 2026

1 months ago

Sarvam-105B

Mar 6, 2026

1 weeks ago

3w newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Key Takeaways

Larger context window (200,000 tokens)
Higher BrowseComp score (75.9% vs 49.5%)
Higher SWE-Bench Verified score (77.8% vs 45.0%)

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Zhipu AI
GLM-5
Sarvam AI
Sarvam-105B