The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

GLM-5.3-Flash vs Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)

GLM-5.3-Flash leads the LLM Stats Score 48.6 to 22.1.

Zhipu AI · NVIDIA · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

GLM-5.3-Flash leads the overall LLM Stats Score 48.6 to 22.1, ranking #28 overall.

In the 3 individual benchmarks reported for both models, GLM-5.3-Flash wins 3; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose GLM-5.3-Flash

  • overall performance matters — it scores 48.6 and ranks #28 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes
  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 3 of 3 exact shared results

Choose Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)

  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Oct 2026

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

GLM-5.3-Flash
Zhipu AI
Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)
NVIDIA
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
48.6
#28
22.1
#202
Reasoning
47.8
#22
19.8
#213
Coding
31.3
#55
2.9
#241
Agents
34.7
#27
-0.7
#198
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
3 of 3
0 of 3
Input price
$0.15 / M
— / M
Output price
$0.50 / M
— / M
Context window
1,048,576
—

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared
Index
GLM-5.3-Flash
Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)
Tool use
29.0#18
-2.1#205
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

15 reported for GLM-5.3-Flash · 10 for Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)

3 shared

GLM-5.3-Flash outperforms in 3 benchmarks (GDPval-AA, Humanity's Last Exam, Terminal-Bench 2.1), while Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) is better at 0 benchmarks.

GLM-5.3-Flash significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Wed Oct 21 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

316.0B diff

GLM-5.3-Flash has 316.0B more parameters than Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B), making it 7900.0% larger.

Zhipu AI
GLM-5.3-Flash
320.0Bparameters
NVIDIA
Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)
4.0Bparameters
320.0B
GLM-5.3-Flash
4.0B
Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only GLM-5.3-Flash specifies input context (1,048,576 tokens). Only GLM-5.3-Flash specifies output context (1,048,576 tokens).

Zhipu AI
GLM-5.3-Flash
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output1,048,576 tokens
NVIDIA
Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Wed Oct 21 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

GLM-5.3-Flash supports multimodal inputs, whereas Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) does not.

GLM-5.3-Flash can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

GLM-5.3-Flash

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

GLM-5.3-Flash is licensed under MIT, while Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) uses OpenMDW License v1.1.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

GLM-5.3-Flash

MIT

Open weights

Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)

OpenMDW License v1.1

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

GLM-5.3-Flash was released on 2026-08-26, while Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) was released on 2026-10-16.

Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) is 2 months newer than GLM-5.3-Flash.

GLM-5.3-Flash

Aug 26, 2026

1 months ago

Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)

Oct 16, 2026

4 days ago

1mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against GLM-5.3-Flash and Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

GLM-5.3-Flash
✓ Preferred
Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about GLM-5.3-Flash vs Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B).

Which is better, GLM-5.3-Flash or Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)?

GLM-5.3-Flash leads the LLM Stats Score 48.6 to 22.1. GLM-5.3-Flash is made by Zhipu AI and Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) is made by NVIDIA. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does GLM-5.3-Flash compare to Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) in benchmarks?

GLM-5.3-Flash scores CharXiv-R: 89.4%, Terminal-Bench 2.1: 84.3%, MMVU: 80.5%, Toolathlon: 78.4%, Chartography: 78.0%. Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) scores IFBench: 77.9%, GPQA: 72.4%, AA-LCR: 71.0%, SWE-Bench Verified: 59.5%, SciCode: 34.9%.

What are the context window sizes for GLM-5.3-Flash and Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)?

GLM-5.3-Flash supports 1.0M tokens and Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between GLM-5.3-Flash and Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (48.6 vs 22.1), multimodal support (yes vs no), licensing (MIT vs OpenMDW License v1.1). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes GLM-5.3-Flash and Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)?

GLM-5.3-Flash is developed by Zhipu AI and Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) is developed by NVIDIA.

Related comparisons