The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

GPT-4o vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro

MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads the LLM Stats Score 40.6 to 11.5.

OpenAI · Xiaomi · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads the overall LLM Stats Score 40.6 to 11.5, ranking #57 overall.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose GPT-4o

  • you want predictable pricing at $2.50/M input and $10.00/M output

Choose MiMo-V2.6-Pro

  • overall performance matters — it scores 40.6 and ranks #57 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes coding — it leads those capability indexes
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

GPT-4o
OpenAI
MiMo-V2.6-Pro
Xiaomi
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
11.5
#260
40.6
#57
Coding
11.7
#155
34.1
#35
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
$2.50 / M
— / M
Output price
$10.00 / M
— / M
Context window
128,000
—

Individual benchmarks

8 reported for GPT-4o · 3 for MiMo-V2.6-Pro

No common benchmarks found

GPT-4o and MiMo-V2.6-Prodon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only GPT-4o specifies input context (128,000 tokens). Only GPT-4o specifies output context (4,096 tokens).

OpenAI
GPT-4o
Input128,000 tokens
Output4,096 tokens
Xiaomi
MiMo-V2.6-Pro
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Mon Sep 21 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Both GPT-4o and MiMo-V2.6-Pro support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

GPT-4o

Text
Images
Audio
Video

MiMo-V2.6-Pro

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

GPT-4o is licensed under a proprietary license, while MiMo-V2.6-Pro uses MIT.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

GPT-4o

Proprietary

Closed source

MiMo-V2.6-Pro

MIT

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

GPT-4o was released on 2024-05-13, while MiMo-V2.6-Pro was released on 2026-09-22.

MiMo-V2.6-Pro is 29 months newer than GPT-4o.

GPT-4o

May 13, 2024

2.4 years ago

MiMo-V2.6-Pro

Sep 22, 2026

-1 days ago

2.4yr newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against GPT-4o and MiMo-V2.6-Pro side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

GPT-4o
✓ Preferred
MiMo-V2.6-Pro
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about GPT-4o vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro.

Which is better, GPT-4o or MiMo-V2.6-Pro?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads the LLM Stats Score 40.6 to 11.5. GPT-4o is made by OpenAI and MiMo-V2.6-Pro is made by Xiaomi. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does GPT-4o compare to MiMo-V2.6-Pro in benchmarks?

GPT-4o scores MGSM: 90.5%, HumanEval: 90.2%, MMLU: 88.7%, DROP: 83.4%, MATH: 76.6%. MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores DeepSWE 1.1: 71.9%, MiMo Coding Bench: 63.2%, Program Bench: 26.5%.

What are the context window sizes for GPT-4o and MiMo-V2.6-Pro?

GPT-4o supports 128K tokens and MiMo-V2.6-Pro supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between GPT-4o and MiMo-V2.6-Pro?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (11.5 vs 40.6), licensing (Proprietary vs MIT). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes GPT-4o and MiMo-V2.6-Pro?

GPT-4o is developed by OpenAI and MiMo-V2.6-Pro is developed by Xiaomi.

Related comparisons