Model Comparison

GPT-4o vs Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B InstructWhich is better in 2026?

Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Verdict: GPT-4o vs Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct — which is better?

GPT-4o (by OpenAI) and Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct (by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team) are two of the AI models people compare most. Here is how they stack up on benchmarks, price and capabilities, and which one to pick in 2026.

GPT-4o outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct is better at 4 benchmarks (Aider-Polyglot, SWE-Bench Verified, TAU-bench Airline, TAU-bench Retail). Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Choose GPT-4o if…

  • you want predictable pricing at $2.50/M input and $10.00/M output

Choose Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct if…

  • you want the strongest raw capability — it leads on 4 of 4 shared benchmarks
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Jan 2025
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune
Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

4 benchmarks

GPT-4o outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct is better at 4 benchmarks (Aider-Polyglot, SWE-Bench Verified, TAU-bench Airline, TAU-bench Retail).

Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Tue Jun 09 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only GPT-4o specifies input context (128,000 tokens). Only GPT-4o specifies output context (16,384 tokens).

OpenAI
GPT-4o
Input128,000 tokens
Output16,384 tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Tue Jun 09 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

GPT-4o supports multimodal inputs, whereas Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct does not.

GPT-4o can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

GPT-4o

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

GPT-4o is licensed under a proprietary license, while Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

GPT-4o

Proprietary

Closed source

Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

GPT-4o was released on 2024-08-06, while Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct was released on 2025-01-31.

Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct is 6 months newer than GPT-4o.

GPT-4o

Aug 6, 2024

1.8 years ago

Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct

Jan 31, 2025

1.4 years ago

5mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

OpenAI
Larger context window (128,000 tokens)
Supports multimodal inputs
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Has open weights
Higher Aider-Polyglot score (61.8% vs 30.7%)
Higher SWE-Bench Verified score (69.6% vs 33.2%)
Higher TAU-bench Airline score (60.0% vs 42.8%)
Higher TAU-bench Retail score (77.5% vs 60.3%)

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
OpenAI
GPT-4o
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct

FAQ

Common questions about GPT-4o vs Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct.

Which is better, GPT-4o or Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct?

Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. GPT-4o is made by OpenAI and Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does GPT-4o compare to Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct in benchmarks?

GPT-4o scores AI2D: 94.2%, DocVQA: 92.8%, ChartQA: 85.7%, MMLU: 85.7%, CharXiv-D: 85.3%. Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct scores TAU-bench Retail: 77.5%, SWE-Bench Verified: 69.6%, BFCL-v3: 68.7%, Aider-Polyglot: 61.8%, TAU-bench Airline: 60.0%.

What are the context window sizes for GPT-4o and Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct?

GPT-4o supports 128K tokens and Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between GPT-4o and Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct?

Key differences include multimodal support (yes vs no), licensing (Proprietary vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes GPT-4o and Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct?

GPT-4o is developed by OpenAI and Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.

Related comparisons