The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

GPT-5 Codex vs Ling 3.0 Flash Fin

GPT-5 Codex and Ling 3.0 Flash Fin are closely matched at 26.6 and 43.0 on the LLM Stats Score.

OpenAI · InclusionAI · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

GPT-5 Codex and Ling 3.0 Flash Fin are closely matched on the overall LLM Stats Score at 26.6 and 43.0.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose GPT-5 Codex

  • you are already invested in the OpenAI ecosystem

Choose Ling 3.0 Flash Fin

  • your work emphasizes reasoning — it leads those capability indexes
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

GPT-5 Codex
OpenAI
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin
InclusionAI
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
26.6
#149
43.0
#44
Reasoning
26.5
#147
44.2
#35
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
— / M
$0.06 / M
Output price
— / M
$0.18 / M
Context window
—
262,144

Individual benchmarks

1 reported for GPT-5 Codex · 6 for Ling 3.0 Flash Fin

No common benchmarks found

GPT-5 Codex and Ling 3.0 Flash Findon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Ling 3.0 Flash Fin specifies input context (262,144 tokens). Only Ling 3.0 Flash Fin specifies output context (262,144 tokens).

OpenAI
GPT-5 Codex
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
InclusionAI
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin
Input262,144 tokens
Output262,144 tokens
Sun Sep 20 2026 • llm-stats.com

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

GPT-5 Codex was released on 2025-09-15, while Ling 3.0 Flash Fin was released on 2026-09-03.

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin is 12 months newer than GPT-5 Codex.

GPT-5 Codex

Sep 15, 2025

1.0 years ago

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin

Sep 3, 2026

2 weeks ago

11mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

GPT-5 Codex has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2024-09-30, while Ling 3.0 Flash Fin's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm GPT-5 Codex's training data extends to 2024-09-30, but cannot make a direct comparison without Ling 3.0 Flash Fin's cutoff date.

GPT-5 Codex

Sep 2024

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin

—

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against GPT-5 Codex and Ling 3.0 Flash Fin side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

GPT-5 Codex
✓ Preferred
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about GPT-5 Codex vs Ling 3.0 Flash Fin.

Which is better, GPT-5 Codex or Ling 3.0 Flash Fin?

GPT-5 Codex and Ling 3.0 Flash Fin are closely matched on the LLM Stats Score at 26.6 and 43.0. GPT-5 Codex is made by OpenAI and Ling 3.0 Flash Fin is made by InclusionAI. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does GPT-5 Codex compare to Ling 3.0 Flash Fin in benchmarks?

GPT-5 Codex scores SWE-Bench Verified: 74.5%. Ling 3.0 Flash Fin scores SpreadSheetBench-v1: 86.5%, Finance Agent v1.1: 69.2%, Finance Agent v2: 59.8%, Tau3 Banking: 41.0%, APEX-Agents: 29.2%.

What are the context window sizes for GPT-5 Codex and Ling 3.0 Flash Fin?

GPT-5 Codex supports an unknown number of tokens and Ling 3.0 Flash Fin supports 262K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between GPT-5 Codex and Ling 3.0 Flash Fin?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (26.6 vs 43.0), licensing (Proprietary vs Unknown). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes GPT-5 Codex and Ling 3.0 Flash Fin?

GPT-5 Codex is developed by OpenAI and Ling 3.0 Flash Fin is developed by InclusionAI.

Related comparisons