The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

GPT-6 Astra vs Grok Code Fast 1

GPT-6 Astra leads the LLM Stats Score 59.6 to 20.7. Grok Code Fast 1 is 38.1x cheaper per token.

OpenAI · xAI · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

GPT-6 Astra leads the overall LLM Stats Score 59.6 to 20.7, ranking #1 overall.

On price, Grok Code Fast 1 is roughly 38.1x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

GPT-6 Astra also accepts a larger context window (1,050,000 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose GPT-6 Astra

  • overall performance matters — it scores 59.6 and ranks #1 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes
  • you process long inputs — it offers a 1,050,000 token context window
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026

Choose Grok Code Fast 1

  • cost matters — it's about 38.1x cheaper per token

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
59.6
#1
20.7
#192
57.5
#1
20.6
#185
48.5
#1
12.9
#140
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
Input price
$10.00 / M
$0.20 / M
Output price
$50.00 / M
$1.50 / M
Context window
1,050,000
256,000

Individual benchmarks

22 reported for GPT-6 Astra · 1 for Grok Code Fast 1

No common benchmarks found

GPT-6 Astra and Grok Code Fast 1don't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Grok Code Fast 1 costs less

For input processing, GPT-6 Astra ($10.00/1M tokens) is 50.0x more expensive than Grok Code Fast 1 ($0.20/1M tokens).

For output processing, GPT-6 Astra ($50.00/1M tokens) is 33.3x more expensive than Grok Code Fast 1 ($1.50/1M tokens).

In conclusion, GPT-6 Astra is more expensive than Grok Code Fast 1.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Sun Sep 20 2026 • llm-stats.com
OpenAI
GPT-6 Astra
Input tokens$10.00
Output tokens$50.00
Best providerOpenAI
xAI
Grok Code Fast 1
Input tokens$0.20
Output tokens$1.50
Best providerxAI
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

GPT-6 Astra accepts 1,050,000 input tokens compared to Grok Code Fast 1's 256,000 tokens. GPT-6 Astra can generate longer responses up to 128,000 tokens, while Grok Code Fast 1 is limited to 10,000 tokens.

OpenAI
GPT-6 Astra
Input1,050,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
xAI
Grok Code Fast 1
Input256,000 tokens
Output10,000 tokens
Sun Sep 20 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

GPT-6 Astra supports multimodal inputs, whereas Grok Code Fast 1 does not.

GPT-6 Astra can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

GPT-6 Astra

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Grok Code Fast 1

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.

Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.

GPT-6 Astra

Proprietary

Closed source

Grok Code Fast 1

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

GPT-6 Astra was released on 2026-09-04, while Grok Code Fast 1 was released on 2025-08-28.

GPT-6 Astra is 12 months newer than Grok Code Fast 1.

GPT-6 Astra

Sep 4, 2026

2 weeks ago

1.0yr newer
Grok Code Fast 1

Aug 28, 2025

1.1 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

GPT-6 Astra has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2026-04-30, while Grok Code Fast 1's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm GPT-6 Astra's training data extends to 2026-04-30, but cannot make a direct comparison without Grok Code Fast 1's cutoff date.

GPT-6 Astra

Apr 2026

Grok Code Fast 1

Provider Availability

GPT-6 Astra is available from OpenAI. Grok Code Fast 1 is available from xAI.

GPT-6 Astra

openai logo
OpenAI
Input Price:Input: $10.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $50.00/1M

Grok Code Fast 1

xai logo
xAI
Input Price:Input: $0.20/1MOutput Price:Output: $1.50/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against GPT-6 Astra and Grok Code Fast 1 side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

GPT-6 Astra
✓ Preferred
Grok Code Fast 1
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about GPT-6 Astra vs Grok Code Fast 1.

Which is better, GPT-6 Astra or Grok Code Fast 1?

GPT-6 Astra leads the LLM Stats Score 59.6 to 20.7. GPT-6 Astra is made by OpenAI and Grok Code Fast 1 is made by xAI. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does GPT-6 Astra compare to Grok Code Fast 1 in benchmarks?

GPT-6 Astra scores ExploitBench: 100.0%, ARC-AGI-3: 99.9%, ARC-AGI: 98.5%, FrontierMath Tier 4 (v2): 97.6%, GPQA: 96.0%. Grok Code Fast 1 scores SWE-Bench Verified: 70.8%.

Is GPT-6 Astra cheaper than Grok Code Fast 1?

Grok Code Fast 1 is 50.0x cheaper for input tokens. GPT-6 Astra costs $10.00/M input and $50.00/M output via openai. Grok Code Fast 1 costs $0.20/M input and $1.50/M output via xai.

What are the context window sizes for GPT-6 Astra and Grok Code Fast 1?

GPT-6 Astra supports 1.1M tokens and Grok Code Fast 1 supports 256K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between GPT-6 Astra and Grok Code Fast 1?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (59.6 vs 20.7), context window (1.1M vs 256K), input pricing ($10.00 vs $0.20/M), multimodal support (yes vs no). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes GPT-6 Astra and Grok Code Fast 1?

GPT-6 Astra is developed by OpenAI and Grok Code Fast 1 is developed by xAI.