The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Grok Code Fast 1 vs Ling 3.0 Flash Fin

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin leads the LLM Stats Score 43.0 to 20.7. Ling 3.0 Flash Fin is 5.8x cheaper per token.

xAI · InclusionAI · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin leads the overall LLM Stats Score 43.0 to 20.7, ranking #44 overall.

On price, Ling 3.0 Flash Fin is roughly 5.8x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin also accepts a larger context window (262,144 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Grok Code Fast 1

  • you want predictable pricing at $0.20/M input and $1.50/M output

Choose Ling 3.0 Flash Fin

  • overall performance matters — it scores 43.0 and ranks #44 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning — it leads those capability indexes
  • cost matters — it's about 5.8x cheaper per token
  • you process long inputs — it offers a 262,144 token context window
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Grok Code Fast 1
xAI
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin
InclusionAI
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
20.7
#192
43.0
#44
Reasoning
20.6
#185
44.2
#35
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
$0.20 / M
$0.06 / M
Output price
$1.50 / M
$0.18 / M
Context window
256,000
262,144

Individual benchmarks

1 reported for Grok Code Fast 1 · 6 for Ling 3.0 Flash Fin

No common benchmarks found

Grok Code Fast 1 and Ling 3.0 Flash Findon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin costs less

For input processing, Grok Code Fast 1 ($0.20/1M tokens) is 3.3x more expensive than Ling 3.0 Flash Fin ($0.06/1M tokens).

For output processing, Grok Code Fast 1 ($1.50/1M tokens) is 8.3x more expensive than Ling 3.0 Flash Fin ($0.18/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Grok Code Fast 1 is more expensive than Ling 3.0 Flash Fin.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Sun Sep 20 2026 • llm-stats.com
xAI
Grok Code Fast 1
Input tokens$0.20
Output tokens$1.50
Best providerxAI
InclusionAI
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin
Input tokens$0.06
Output tokens$0.18
Best providerDeepinfra
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin accepts 262,144 input tokens compared to Grok Code Fast 1's 256,000 tokens. Ling 3.0 Flash Fin can generate longer responses up to 262,144 tokens, while Grok Code Fast 1 is limited to 10,000 tokens.

xAI
Grok Code Fast 1
Input256,000 tokens
Output10,000 tokens
InclusionAI
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin
Input262,144 tokens
Output262,144 tokens
Sun Sep 20 2026 • llm-stats.com

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Grok Code Fast 1 was released on 2025-08-28, while Ling 3.0 Flash Fin was released on 2026-09-03.

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin is 12 months newer than Grok Code Fast 1.

Grok Code Fast 1

Aug 28, 2025

1.1 years ago

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin

Sep 3, 2026

2 weeks ago

1.0yr newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

Grok Code Fast 1 is available from xAI. Ling 3.0 Flash Fin is available from DeepInfra.

Grok Code Fast 1

xai logo
xAI
Input Price:Input: $0.20/1MOutput Price:Output: $1.50/1M

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin

deepinfra logo
Deepinfra
Input Price:Input: $0.06/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.18/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Grok Code Fast 1 and Ling 3.0 Flash Fin side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Grok Code Fast 1
✓ Preferred
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Grok Code Fast 1 vs Ling 3.0 Flash Fin.

Which is better, Grok Code Fast 1 or Ling 3.0 Flash Fin?

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin leads the LLM Stats Score 43.0 to 20.7. Grok Code Fast 1 is made by xAI and Ling 3.0 Flash Fin is made by InclusionAI. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Grok Code Fast 1 compare to Ling 3.0 Flash Fin in benchmarks?

Grok Code Fast 1 scores SWE-Bench Verified: 70.8%. Ling 3.0 Flash Fin scores SpreadSheetBench-v1: 86.5%, Finance Agent v1.1: 69.2%, Finance Agent v2: 59.8%, Tau3 Banking: 41.0%, APEX-Agents: 29.2%.

Is Grok Code Fast 1 cheaper than Ling 3.0 Flash Fin?

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin is 3.3x cheaper for input tokens. Grok Code Fast 1 costs $0.20/M input and $1.50/M output via xai. Ling 3.0 Flash Fin costs $0.06/M input and $0.18/M output via deepinfra.

What are the context window sizes for Grok Code Fast 1 and Ling 3.0 Flash Fin?

Grok Code Fast 1 supports 256K tokens and Ling 3.0 Flash Fin supports 262K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Grok Code Fast 1 and Ling 3.0 Flash Fin?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (20.7 vs 43.0), context window (256K vs 262K), input pricing ($0.20 vs $0.06/M), licensing (Proprietary vs Unknown). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Grok Code Fast 1 and Ling 3.0 Flash Fin?

Grok Code Fast 1 is developed by xAI and Ling 3.0 Flash Fin is developed by InclusionAI.

Related comparisons