The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber vs Grok Code Fast 1

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber leads the LLM Stats Score 40.3 to 20.7.

Google · xAI · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber leads the overall LLM Stats Score 40.3 to 20.7, ranking #55 overall.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber

  • overall performance matters — it scores 40.3 and ranks #55 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes coding — it leads those capability indexes
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026

Choose Grok Code Fast 1

  • you want predictable pricing at $0.20/M input and $1.50/M output

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber
Google
Grok Code Fast 1
xAI
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
40.3
#55
20.7
#192
Coding
33.1
#36
12.9
#140
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
— / M
$0.20 / M
Output price
— / M
$1.50 / M
Context window
—
256,000

Individual benchmarks

4 reported for Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber · 1 for Grok Code Fast 1

No common benchmarks found

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber and Grok Code Fast 1don't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Grok Code Fast 1 specifies input context (256,000 tokens). Only Grok Code Fast 1 specifies output context (10,000 tokens).

Google
Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
xAI
Grok Code Fast 1
Input256,000 tokens
Output10,000 tokens
Sun Sep 20 2026 • llm-stats.com

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.

Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber

Proprietary

Closed source

Grok Code Fast 1

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber was released on 2026-09-02, while Grok Code Fast 1 was released on 2025-08-28.

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber is 12 months newer than Grok Code Fast 1.

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber

Sep 2, 2026

2 weeks ago

1.0yr newer
Grok Code Fast 1

Aug 28, 2025

1.1 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber and Grok Code Fast 1 side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber
✓ Preferred
Grok Code Fast 1
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber vs Grok Code Fast 1.

Which is better, Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber or Grok Code Fast 1?

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber leads the LLM Stats Score 40.3 to 20.7. Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber is made by Google and Grok Code Fast 1 is made by xAI. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber compare to Grok Code Fast 1 in benchmarks?

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber scores Gray Swan IPI Benchmark: 94.0%, CyberGym: 86.2%, Google Real-world Vulnerability Discovery: 71.0%, CWE-Bench: 47.2%. Grok Code Fast 1 scores SWE-Bench Verified: 70.8%.

What are the context window sizes for Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber and Grok Code Fast 1?

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber supports an unknown number of tokens and Grok Code Fast 1 supports 256K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber and Grok Code Fast 1?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (40.3 vs 20.7). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber and Grok Code Fast 1?

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber is developed by Google and Grok Code Fast 1 is developed by xAI.

Related comparisons