The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

GPT-6 Rosalind vs MAI-Code-1.1-Flash

Comparing GPT-6 Rosalind and MAI-Code-1.1-Flash across benchmarks, pricing, and capabilities.

OpenAI · Microsoft · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

GPT-6 Rosalind and MAI-Code-1.1-Flash trade strengths across price, capabilities, and technical limits. The better choice depends on the workload.

On price, MAI-Code-1.1-Flash is roughly 66.7x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose GPT-6 Rosalind

  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Oct 2026

Choose MAI-Code-1.1-Flash

  • cost matters — it's about 66.7x cheaper per token

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
$15.00 / M
$0.20 / M
Output price
$75.00 / M
$1.20 / M
Context window
—
256,000

Individual benchmarks

0 reported for GPT-6 Rosalind · 2 for MAI-Code-1.1-Flash

No common benchmarks found

GPT-6 Rosalind and MAI-Code-1.1-Flashdon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

MAI-Code-1.1-Flash costs less

For input processing, GPT-6 Rosalind ($15.00/1M tokens) is 75.0x more expensive than MAI-Code-1.1-Flash ($0.20/1M tokens).

For output processing, GPT-6 Rosalind ($75.00/1M tokens) is 62.5x more expensive than MAI-Code-1.1-Flash ($1.20/1M tokens).

In conclusion, GPT-6 Rosalind is more expensive than MAI-Code-1.1-Flash.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Fri Nov 06 2026 • llm-stats.com
OpenAI
GPT-6 Rosalind
Input tokens$15.00
Output tokens$75.00
Best providerOpenAI
Microsoft
MAI-Code-1.1-Flash
Input tokens$0.20
Output tokens$1.20
Best providerUnknown Organization
Notice missing or incorrect data?

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only MAI-Code-1.1-Flash specifies input context (256,000 tokens).

OpenAI
GPT-6 Rosalind
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Microsoft
MAI-Code-1.1-Flash
Input256,000 tokens
Output- tokens
Fri Nov 06 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Both GPT-6 Rosalind and MAI-Code-1.1-Flash support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

GPT-6 Rosalind

Text
Images
Audio
Video

MAI-Code-1.1-Flash

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.

Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.

GPT-6 Rosalind

Proprietary

Closed source

MAI-Code-1.1-Flash

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

GPT-6 Rosalind was released on 2026-10-30, while MAI-Code-1.1-Flash was released on 2026-08-11.

GPT-6 Rosalind is 3 months newer than MAI-Code-1.1-Flash.

GPT-6 Rosalind

Oct 30, 2026

6 days ago

2mo newer
MAI-Code-1.1-Flash

Aug 11, 2026

2 months ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

GPT-6 Rosalind is available from OpenAI. MAI-Code-1.1-Flash is available from GitHub Copilot.

GPT-6 Rosalind

openai logo
OpenAI
Input Price:Input: $15.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $75.00/1M

MAI-Code-1.1-Flash

github-copilot logo
Unknown Organization
Input Price:Input: $0.20/1MOutput Price:Output: $1.20/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against GPT-6 Rosalind and MAI-Code-1.1-Flash side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

GPT-6 Rosalind
✓ Preferred
MAI-Code-1.1-Flash
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about GPT-6 Rosalind vs MAI-Code-1.1-Flash.

Which is better, GPT-6 Rosalind or MAI-Code-1.1-Flash?

GPT-6 Rosalind (OpenAI) and MAI-Code-1.1-Flash (Microsoft) each have strengths in different areas. Compare their benchmark scores, pricing, context windows, and capabilities above to determine which fits your needs.

How does GPT-6 Rosalind compare to MAI-Code-1.1-Flash in benchmarks?

MAI-Code-1.1-Flash scores SWE-Bench Verified: 72.6%, Terminal-Bench 2.1: 62.9%.

Is GPT-6 Rosalind cheaper than MAI-Code-1.1-Flash?

MAI-Code-1.1-Flash is 75.0x cheaper for input tokens. GPT-6 Rosalind costs $15.00/M input and $75.00/M output via openai. MAI-Code-1.1-Flash costs $0.20/M input and $1.20/M output via github-copilot.

What are the context window sizes for GPT-6 Rosalind and MAI-Code-1.1-Flash?

GPT-6 Rosalind supports an unknown number of tokens and MAI-Code-1.1-Flash supports 256K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between GPT-6 Rosalind and MAI-Code-1.1-Flash?

Key differences include input pricing ($15.00 vs $0.20/M). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes GPT-6 Rosalind and MAI-Code-1.1-Flash?

GPT-6 Rosalind is developed by OpenAI and MAI-Code-1.1-Flash is developed by Microsoft.