GPT-6.1 Terra vs MAI-Code-1.1-Flash
GPT-6.1 Terra leads the LLM Stats Score 47.5 to 27.4. MAI-Code-1.1-Flash is 4.4x cheaper per token.
OpenAI · Microsoft · Updated for 2026
Which is better?
GPT-6.1 Terra leads the overall LLM Stats Score 47.5 to 27.4, ranking #36 overall.
On price, MAI-Code-1.1-Flash is roughly 4.4x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.
GPT-6.1 Terra also accepts a larger context window (1,050,000 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.
Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.
Choose GPT-6.1 Terra
- overall performance matters — it scores 47.5 and ranks #36 on LLM Stats
- your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes
- you process long inputs — it offers a 1,050,000 token context window
- you want the most recent training data — it shipped Oct 2026
Choose MAI-Code-1.1-Flash
- cost matters — it's about 4.4x cheaper per token
At a glance
The differences that matter most.
Individual benchmarks
8 reported for GPT-6.1 Terra · 2 for MAI-Code-1.1-Flash
GPT-6.1 Terra and MAI-Code-1.1-Flashdon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.
Human preference
Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores
Pricing Analysis
Price comparison per million tokens
For input processing, GPT-6.1 Terra ($1.00/1M tokens) is 5.0x more expensive than MAI-Code-1.1-Flash ($0.20/1M tokens).
For output processing, GPT-6.1 Terra ($5.00/1M tokens) is 4.2x more expensive than MAI-Code-1.1-Flash ($1.20/1M tokens).
In conclusion, GPT-6.1 Terra is more expensive than MAI-Code-1.1-Flash.*
* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens
Context Window
Maximum input and output token capacity
GPT-6.1 Terra accepts 1,050,000 input tokens compared to MAI-Code-1.1-Flash's 256,000 tokens. Only GPT-6.1 Terra specifies output context (128,000 tokens).
Input capabilities
Documented input modalities across available providers
Both GPT-6.1 Terra and MAI-Code-1.1-Flash support multimodal inputs.
They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.
GPT-6.1 Terra
MAI-Code-1.1-Flash
License
Usage and distribution terms
Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.
Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.
Proprietary
Closed source
Proprietary
Closed source
Release Timeline
When each model was launched
GPT-6.1 Terra was released on 2026-10-26, while MAI-Code-1.1-Flash was released on 2026-08-11.
GPT-6.1 Terra is 3 months newer than MAI-Code-1.1-Flash.
Oct 26, 2026
-1 days ago
2mo newerAug 11, 2026
2 months ago
Knowledge Cutoff
When training data ends
GPT-6.1 Terra has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2026-06-01, while MAI-Code-1.1-Flash's cutoff date is not specified.
We can confirm GPT-6.1 Terra's training data extends to 2026-06-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without MAI-Code-1.1-Flash's cutoff date.
Jun 2026
—
Provider Availability
GPT-6.1 Terra is available from OpenAI. MAI-Code-1.1-Flash is available from GitHub Copilot.
GPT-6.1 Terra
MAI-Code-1.1-Flash
Outputs Comparison
Judge for yourself.
Run your own prompts against GPT-6.1 Terra and MAI-Code-1.1-Flash side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.
FAQ
Common questions about GPT-6.1 Terra vs MAI-Code-1.1-Flash.